Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question is related to the discussion on Model Validation Criteria However it appeard to be very high level to me and I would like to go more into detail.

Not working at a pricing desk the following has always puzzled me: How are quants able to verify whether their calculated prices are any good? (by "calculated prices" I mean the ones output by some model - e.g. B&S, Heston )

One could perhaps distingusih the two:

  • A priori
  • A posteriori

I would assume a priory mainly consists of model choice (fitting the market data etc.) - Thus the A priori part is related to this question.

Alas, I am quite clueless what an a posteriori check would look like. What would be the benchmark one would check against ?

share|improve this question
In a risk-neutral setting the P&L should be the definitive a posteriori verification, right? – user1157 Feb 23 '14 at 12:14
When you say their calculated prices, you're referring to the values that are output from models (like pricing an option with BS), right, rather than the bid/ask prices quoted in the market? – John Feb 23 '14 at 14:43
correct - I will edit the questipn - this is a necessary specification :) thank you – Probilitator Feb 23 '14 at 14:44
On the sell-side, one could argue that a 'good' model is one whose a posteriori replication PNL exceeds the quoted margin, or perhaps one that allowed you to sell the deal in the first place (depending on your level of cynicism). On the buy-side, assuming you aren't hedging, then a posteriori, the models which identify options that are mis-priced under P are the good ones. There's a big difference between models which are widely used, models which match the market well, and models which capture asset dynamics accurately. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2365294 – experquisite Feb 23 '14 at 19:04
thank you for the paper. Do you have any more references on the topic. Please write your comment as an answer. It was already a great help - I would like to upvote it and for it to be visible to other. cheers – Probilitator Feb 24 '14 at 8:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.