Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am confused on the following:

When we price swaption, the market convention is to use Black's Model which assumes forward swap rate is following Black's model under the Q(t) measure.

When we tries to use SABR, the forward swap rate is again model depending on the value of Beta.

If we were to calibrate SABR for Swaption volatility, will there be a inconsistency with specifying the model for forward swap rate?

Thanks for clarifying


share|improve this question

To calibrate BS you compute volatility $\sigma$, to calibrate SABR you compute implied $\alpha$, the volvol and $\beta$, the skewness. These parameters does not play the same role. So you can't really use the parameters of one models to calibrate another.

But you can build equivalent parmaters, i.e. compute an equivalent vol under SABR to use BS pricing formula.

Look at the asymptotic solution paragraph:


share|improve this answer

My understanding is you can calibrate with atm vol which should be close with either model then the otm vols are taken care of by the beta parameter from sabr

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.