Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have some work to do on the drivers of government bond spreads - ie. across terms (not across governments) of the yield curve, say 5yr and 20yr bond spreads from the same government issuer - and am having a bit of conceptual difficulty with this.

I have done some reading and get a sense that potential drivers could be: credit risk (measured by Credit default swap (CDS) rates); liquidity risk (measured by bid-ask apreads); risk aversion; crisis-period variable (a indicator variable assigned a value 1 during the latest financial crisis);

Should I just take the difference of these variables (and assume the differencing renders the variables stationary) and then run OLS regression of the bond spreads on the drivers?

Are there better ways to go about this? Would PCA have any application here?

Thanks in advance for any advice

share|improve this question

A good piece of literature on this is Colin-Dufresne et al. (2001), "The Determinants of Credit Spread Changes", Journal of Finance, 56, 2177-2207.

I think differencing all variables is a good idea in this case. Not only because of stationarity concerns but also because of unobserved time-invariant issuer-level characteristics.

I do not see the case for a PCA here. Usually you use PCA to reduce dimensionality of sometimes highly correlated variables. Here you have variables at hand that seem to capture different risk premia.

share|improve this answer
Thanks Roberto . – user7833 Apr 17 '14 at 9:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.