Take the 2-minute tour ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Say I have two risk factors $X_1$ and $X_2$. Standard deviation for $X_1$ is $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ for $X_2$. Furthermore, $X_1$ has a mean of $\mu_1$ and $X_2$ has a mean of $\mu_2$. Correlation between $X_1$ and $X_2$ is $\rho$.

The system is as follows:

$$\begin{eqnarray} X_1 & = & \mu_1 + \lambda_{11} U_1 \\ X_2 & = & \mu_2 + \lambda_{21} U_1 + \lambda_{22} U_2 \end{eqnarray}$$

My book reads as follows:

"Accordingly:
$\lambda_{11}=\sigma_1$ (1)
$\lambda_{21}^2 + \lambda_{22}^2= \sigma_2^2$ (2)
$\lambda_{21} \lambda_{11}= \rho \sigma_1 \sigma_2$ (3)"

I don't understand how they work out lines (2) and (3).

Can anyone please help?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

If $\Sigma$ is the variance/covariance matrix of random variables $U_1, U_2, \ldots U_n$, and $V = c + w_1 U_1 + \ldots + w_n U_n$, where $c$ is a constant, and we let $\mathbf{w}$ be the vector with the 'weights' $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_n$, then the variance of $V$ is equal to $\mathbf{w}^{\top}\Sigma\mathbf{w}$. Moreover, if $T$ is another random variable described by weights vector $\mathbf{x}$, then the variance of $T$ is $\mathbf{x}^{\top}\Sigma\mathbf{x}$, and the covariance of $V$ and $T$ is equal to $\mathbf{x}^{\top}\Sigma\mathbf{w}$.

In your problem, $$ \Sigma = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} $$ and you are looking at weights vectors $[\lambda_{11}\,0]$ and $[\lambda_{21}\,\lambda_{22}]$, thus the variance of $X_1$ is $\lambda_{11}^2$, which is the first equation, and the variance of $X_2$ is $\lambda_{21}^2 + \lambda_{22}^2$, which is the second equation. Computing the covariance of $X_1$ and $X_2$ gives the third equation.

share|improve this answer

You should offer more details [I assume U1 and U2 are N(0,1)] but I think you should read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholesky_decomposition

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks. I did forget to mention U1 and U2 were N(0,1). The link you provided is interesting. However I would appreciate a more specific reply especially how lines 2 and 3 are worked out from a mathematical point of view. Regards, Julien. –  Julien May 31 '11 at 17:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.