Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The book of Financial Risk forecasting by Danielsson gives the following example about VAR manipulation. I have two questions:

1) If $0> VAR_1 > VAR_0$ , why the following figure plots it as $-VAR_1> -VAR_0$. I think $-VAR_1$ should be placed at the left side of $-VAR_0$.

2) I am not clear how does the manipulation strategy marked with yellow work. In other words, why it can lower the expected profit.

enter image description here

enter image description here

share|improve this question

First, I am quite sure that this is a typo and it should be $$ 0 < VaR_1 < VaR_0 $$ then $$ -VaR_0 < -VaR_1 $$ and the plot is correct.

Second, the put strategy does not change only the expected profit but the whole distribution of the P&L. If you buy a put with strike $K_1 = -VaR_1$ then you get compensated for losses below $K_1$. But you have to buy this option and pay a premium for it,say $P_1$ - this is a certain loss. To make this hedge cheaper you can sell a put at a lower strike $K_0$ at the price $P_0$. Then you will be compensated for any loss between $K_1$ and $K_0$ and you pay for it $P_1-P_0$. The premium payments change your expected profit but additionally the whole P&L is altered.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.