3
$\begingroup$

I was thinking of using Geometric Brownian Motion to forecast future prices of timber (say one variable, the stumpage price of sawtimber).

I tested the time series with Augmented Dickey-Fuller test and found the data series as non-stationary which means the series follows a random walk. Then, I went on to use it for price forecast.

However, my professor comes and says we cannot use GBM to forecast future prices that has long horizon.

In my case, I wanted to use quarterly price into 10 years or 15 years into the future. I know GBM is a good model for stock prices for short periods, but is 10 or 15 years too far considering the confidence limits and probable volatility?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I'd read up on Schiller's CAPE ratio. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2015 at 5:38
  • $\begingroup$ The reason why GBM would be better short-term than not long-term is not obvious to me. Did your professor justify his claim by something? Besides, GBM models asset prices (not returns), were you expecting these to be stationary? $\endgroup$
    – SRKX
    Feb 11, 2015 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ I suspect the typical price evolution of commodities to be different from stock prices. I do know nothing about timber, but do prices have some seasonality? What might be main drivers of the unit root? Demand growth, inflation etc.? That said, I agree with SRKX. Maybe your professor meant that there is some specific mid to long term structure in timber prices which can be exploited by forecasting? $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2015 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ In how far does GBM help you in forecasting? As a stochastic model - yes. As a forecast: no. $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Feb 11, 2015 at 8:23

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.