Take the 2-minute tour ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A friend of mine who studies game theory suggested that credit ratings from the bond ratings agencies, such as Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, may suffer from a sort of "ratings inflation" similar to the grade inflation seen in many colleges. What are the forces driving grade inflation and how would those same forces apply to bond ratings? Is there any evidence that ratings inflation has taken place?

share|improve this question
    
That's an interesting research topic actually. –  Dimitris Oct 4 '11 at 10:08
    
Yeah, unfortunately this doesn't seem to be the right forum for this question. I'm waiting for economics.SE to open so I can ask this there. –  Tal Fishman Oct 4 '11 at 10:11
    
One could do a quick study of the distribution of debt/equity ratios (or better, KMV style distances to default) by rating. –  Brian B Oct 5 '11 at 19:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is an interesting question. I'll make a guess on what may be the driving factors for "ratings inflation" based on these assumptions:

  1. Rating agencies compete among themselves to conduct bond rating business with issuers, since they are paid for their services by the issuer.
  2. Bond issuers choose the agency that promises the highest rating, since the issuers benefit from having higher ratings through lower costs of debt.

Let's suppose one issuer's bond has a true rating of BBB (I adopt S&P's scale) and rating agencies know this. Now each agency may have an incentive to promise an A rating, which is one notch higher, if the benefit from doing so (winning the business) exceeds the cost (harm to reputation if the bond performs poorly). But, then each rating agency may have an incentive to promise an AA if again benefits exceed costs, and so on.

To cut the long story short, in this setting, we might have an equilibrium in which all agencies inflate ratings and issuers choose randomly among these agencies. Note that in this equilibrium, if any agency diverges by promising the true rating, which is lower, it loses all of its bond rating business to competitors.

Hope this explanation makes sense!

share|improve this answer
    
Hi Investeem, welcome to quant.SE and thanks for offering your answer. –  Tal Fishman Jan 17 '12 at 15:10
    
Thanks Tal! I look forward to contributing more to quant.SE! –  Investeem Jan 17 '12 at 23:03
    
The agencies typically won't go back and change ratings after they've been issued without good reason, so the "round-robin" inflation effect you suggested doesn't really exist. This is because the investment banks are trying to get it to market asap and continual delays cause major damage to the agencies. Last year when S&P re-rated and eventually refused to rate a Goldman Sachs CMBS deal, they were shut out of the market for almost an entire year. –  jeff m Dec 7 '12 at 14:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.