Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are there any "standard" VaR calculations run in a batch?

For example, testing a VaR calculation with a lag of 1,2, 5 or 10 days over 2 years?

Same question for the percentile, 1%, 2.5%, 5% etc.

share|improve this question
Hi ghostJago, welcome to quant.SE and thanks for asking your question here. – Tal Fishman Sep 20 '11 at 13:50
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Standard (read: regulators will accept it) could be a one day, 99% VaR calculated with two years of historical data. A minimum of one year of history is needed although this is not the norm. Typically the one-day VaR is transformed into a 10-day VaR by scaling the calculation by sqrt(10). However, the new market risk rule governs that one justify their use of the square-root factor leaving the alternative of an actual 10-day VaR calculation (a lag of 10 days as you suggest).

share|improve this answer

Usually when it is for (market) risk management purposes it is quite standard to have 1 day horizon with (allegedly ;-) ) 99% confidence level.

As far as I know when it is for regulatory or economic capital requirement and/or Asset Liability Management then horizons might be much longer up to one year and confidence levels are usually 99% and 95%.


share|improve this answer

I think time length should very dependent on the holding period you are looking at.(This is at least how we handle) For example, if you turn your book every ten minutes, a 6 month time frame could be sufficient. If your holding periods are on a monthly basis, you will need much longer holding periods

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.