Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Where can I find derivation of formula for portfolio skewness and kurtosis? I can find formulas everywhere, but not their derivations? For example, the portfolio variance formula is well known and I can find the derivation of that formula in a lot of books, but I can't find anything on portfolio skewness formula and kurtosis. They are just given the way they are. I'm not strong enough at probability theory to use it to derive the formulas from the expectations operator. Who was the first person to derive them? Where were they first published?

share|improve this question

What is the data basis that you start from? If you just have the covariance matrix, then you can only calculate portfolio variance or volatility by $$ w^T \Sigma w$$ where $w$ are the portfolio weights and $\Sigma$ is the covariance matrix. If you have the individual asset continuously compounded returns $r^j_t$ where $j$ indexes assets, $j=1,\ldots,N$, and $t$ stands for time, $t=1,\ldots,T$, then you can also calculate the portfolio returns for each points in time $$r_t = \sum_{j=1}^N w_j r^j_t$$ and then apply the standard variance estimator on $(r_t)_{t=1}^T$. Coming back to your question, having $(r_t)_{t=1}^T$ you can calculate skewness and kurtosis on this sample. You find the formulas on wikipedia.

share|improve this answer
i know how to calculate it when i have the formulae, but the derivation of the given formulas is what i need. you just can't say this is the formula as it is without no proof or derivation. that is what i need – mary Jun 23 '12 at 18:38
@mary When you go to the level of portfolio returns then the standard estimators for skewness and kurtotis apply. So any derivation of these estimators would hold for a general prove. The first formula above e.g. is just algebra and the standard estimator. In the case that we assume iid returns (w.r.t. time) we just work with a sample and the portfolio case is not different from the standard case. – Richard Aug 20 '12 at 20:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.