Take the 2-minute tour ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a version of Girsanov theorem when the volatility is changing?

For example Girsanov theorem states that Radon Nikodym (RN) derivative for a stochastic equation is used to transform the expectation where the sampling is done in one mesaure to an expectation where sampling is done in another measure.

Let's see an example

$dX_t(w) = f(X_t(w))dt + \sigma(X_t(w))dW_t^P(w)$ in P measure.

In P* measure, drift is $f^{*}(X_t(w))$. We multiply the internals of expectation in P measure with RN derivative to get expectation of X in P* measure

$E^{P^*}[X] = E^P[X \frac{dP^*}{dP}]$

where

$\frac{dP^*}{dP}=e^{-0.5 \int (\frac{ f^{*}(X_s(w)) - f(X_s(w))}{\sigma(X_s(w))})^2ds + \int \frac{ f*(X_s(w)) - f(X_s(w))}{\sigma(X_s(w))} dW_s^P(w)}$

What I am looking for is in P* measure, not only drift but also the volatility changes

$dX_t(w) = f^{*}(X_t(w))dt + \sigma^{*}(X_t(w))dW_t^P(w)$

Then what is $\frac{dP^*}{dP}$?

share|improve this question
1  
Just one small thing. I think you're to do $E^P[X\frac{dP}{dP^*}]$ to change measure from $P$ to $P^*$. Consider this expression in the form of an integral; $\displaystyle \ \ \int_\Omega X (\frac{dP}{dP^*})dP\frac{dP^*}{dP} = E^P[X\frac{dP}{dP^*}]$. –  Jase Nov 12 '12 at 14:48
    
Agreed with Jase' comment that $$E_Q\left[ F(X) \right] = E_P\left[ F(X) \frac{dQ(x)}{dP(x)} \right]$$ . –  William S. Wong Dec 6 '12 at 21:27
add comment

2 Answers 2

The Girsanov theorem applies to any compatible change of measure, including a volatility change. The version you have written above is a simplified version for drift changes only, but if you look in any good stochastic calculus book, you will see that full version just requires that you be able to compute the cross-variation of the two processes.

share|improve this answer
2  
Come on @Brian B, I know you probably know the answer by heart (haha). Even if not, please include it in your answer it would help the site with another of your good answers... (for later search engines visibility and for later users browsing the site) –  SRKX Nov 13 '12 at 0:01
    
Can you provide a reference for your comment? –  adam Nov 13 '12 at 18:27
    
I actually just checked Karatzas and Shreve without finding the version/result I am thinking of -- did I imagine it? I may withdraw this answer. –  Brian B Nov 14 '12 at 4:15
    
I also remember something about only requiring that your vol be a bounded process with finite quadratic variation in order for the theorem to be valid at this step: $$ d\tilde W_t = (\frac{\mu-r} \sigma )dt + dW_t $$ such that $$ d\tilde W_t $$ is still a brownian motion –  SpeedBoots Nov 14 '12 at 20:44
add comment

I don't think Girsanov's formula works when the volatilities are different between the P measure and P* measure. P and P* will be singular with respect to each other.

Please see Prof. Goodman's class notes on page 11 at http://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/StochCalc2012/notes/Week10.pdf .

Also, from [ http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-450-analytics-of-finance-fall-2010/lecture-notes/MIT15_450F10_lec02.pdf ] page 54:

a probability measure assigns relative likelihood to different trajectories of the Brownian motion. Variance of the Ito process can be recovered from the shape of a single trajectory (quadratic variation), so it does not depend on the relative likelihood of the trajectories, hence, does not depend on the choice of the probability measure.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.