Tell me more ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to simulate stock price paths with different stochastic processes. I started with the famous geometric brownian motion. I simulated the values with the following formula:

$$R_i=\frac{S_{i+1}-S_i}{S_i}=\mu \Delta t + \sigma \varphi \sqrt{\Delta t}$$

with:

$\mu= $ sample mean

$\sigma= $ sample volatility

$\Delta t = $ 1 (1 day)

$\varphi=$ random number

I used a short way of simulating: Simulate normally distributed random numbers with sample mean and sample standard deviation.

Multiplicate this with the stock price, this gives the price increment.

Calculate Sum of price increment and stock price and this gives the simulated stock price value. (This methodology can be found here)

So I thought I understood this, but now I found the following formula, which is also the geometric brownian motion:

$$ S_t = a \exp\left[\left(\mu - \frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right) t + \sigma W_t \right] $$

I do not understand the difference? What does the second formula says in comparison to the first? Should I have taken the second one? How should I simulate with the second formula?

share|improve this question
This method is really close to be off-topic, but it can be interesting for later users so I'll still answer it. – SRKX Nov 22 '12 at 8:37
2  
@SRKX, by the way, why would this question be close to be off-topic? I find it more on target than 30%-40% of all other questions recently asked. You will be surprised how many market practitioners cannot answer this seemingly simple question, even those on the derivatives and exotics side. – Freddy Nov 22 '12 at 9:12
@Freddy well GBM is the most basic process used in Quant finance. If you don't know it's closed and discrete form, it's unlikely you are a professional quant (you might be a trader, or something else...) which is the target niche of users. But I still answered it, because it can be useful and then we can close other questions related to the topic and refer to this one. – SRKX Nov 22 '12 at 9:22
1  
Please do not hesitate to register in order to help the site grow and make it out of beta! – SRKX Nov 22 '12 at 9:24
1  
@Freddy we try our best to close the one we find off-topic, maybe some of them went through. About registration, I was talking to the user who wrote the question, and it helps in the Area51 stats for make it out of beta. – SRKX Nov 22 '12 at 9:30
show 3 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

The way you do it in the first place is a discretization of the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) process. This method is most useful when you want to compute the path between $S_0$ and $S_t$, i.e. you want to know all the intermediary points $S_i$ for $0 \leq i \leq t$.

The second equation is a closed form solution for the GBM given $S_0$. A simple mathematical proof showed that, if you know the initial point $S_0$ (which is $a$ in your equation), then the value of the process at time $t$ is given by your equation (which contains $W_t$ so $S_t$ is still random). However, this method does not tell your anything about the path.

share|improve this answer
1  
nice concise explanation. Upvoted – Freddy Nov 22 '12 at 9:03
ok, thanks @SRKX – user1690846 Nov 22 '12 at 9:06

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.