Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have two related questions concerning Black Scholes and delta hedging. I thought about this two questions, but I could not come up with an answer, so maybe you guys & girls can help me:

  1. If an option is at the money, how can the Black Scholes price be calculated in a very fast way (possibly without any big calculations)?

  2. If an option is at the money, how many shares do you have to buy in order to delta-hedge?

share|improve this question
Is this a homework assignment? These are the most commonly presented results in any textbook on options pricing. – chrisaycock Dec 31 '12 at 12:14
  1. See this question
  2. You have to buy/sell $\Delta$ shares. $\Delta_{ATM} \approx 0.5$.
share|improve this answer
  1. stock price * volatility * 0.4 * sqt(T), where T denotes time to expiration in years and 0.4 is coming from sqt(1/(2*pi)). The simplifying assumption here is (and that is very important and you will most likely be asked to state the assumptions should such question be asked in the interview): strike price equals underlying asset price AND asset prices are NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED (unlike the assumption in B-S) which assumes the asset price to follow an ARITHMETIC Brownian motion.

  2. As the delta is approximately (stress, not equal) 0.5, you need to hedge with about 1/2 the amount of the underlying asset that the options contract stipulates.

share|improve this answer
ok thanks @Freddy, but what is an arithmetic brownian motion? What is the difference to geometric brownian motion? – user1690846 Dec 31 '12 at 9:54
@user1690846, well I kind of pointed to it, its a Brownian motion where the asset price distribution is assumed to be normal and not log-normal. – Matt Wolf Dec 31 '12 at 10:04
@chrisaycock, of course, just edited the answer – Matt Wolf Dec 31 '12 at 12:28
actually, asset prices do not follow arithmetic brownian motion in .4 *S*$\sigma * \sqrt{T}$, it is still geometric brownian motion. just do a simple taylor expansion on B-S formula and you will see – Andrew Dec 31 '12 at 21:25
@Andrew, I said the assumption is of the asset price to be normally distributed which is the equivalent of an asset price model of arithmetic Brownian motion. – Matt Wolf Jan 1 '13 at 5:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.