Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If orders are filled pro rata, is there still incentive to engage in HFT? Because pro rata nullifies the time precedence rule, my intuition is no, but I figure there could be other aspects to it I'm unaware of.

share|improve this question
E-mini futures? – pyCthon Oct 25 '13 at 2:49
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The Eurodollar market is partially pro-rata. And there is a lot of HFT on it. Getting out of the book when conditions are not right is very much HFT.

share|improve this answer
When you say getting out of the book, do you mean order cancelling or something else? – Joseph Garvin Mar 13 '11 at 22:06
Yes, order canceling when your algo feels that it's a bad place to be in the book (it's about to get hit) – Meh Mar 14 '11 at 11:26

Market markers still have to consume market data. The techniques required to scale a live order book in real-time will be the same regardless of the intended use case. So while the strategies will be different from what we know as HFT (and even the participants different), the systems in use will be very similar.

share|improve this answer

Yes. You're right that queue position is less important in a pure pro-rata market. But in a market that is very deep, such as Eurodollars, the cost of getting adversely selected ("catching a falling dagger") is huge (very large bid/ask spread). So it is critical to cancel any open orders quickly when the price is about to move.

share|improve this answer

My guess is you are right in that it will be unprofitable to be a liquidity provider because of the lack of time priority.

However, liquidity taking strategy (taking out an order that is mis-priced) is still a speed game.

share|improve this answer
By 'taking out an order' do you mean cancelling your own order or filling someone else's? – Joseph Garvin Mar 13 '11 at 22:10
Taking liquidity usually means filling someone else's. – Konsta Apr 18 '12 at 21:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.