Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can you use the variance ratio test to determine whether or not a time series is mean reverting? I'm using the Lo.Mac function in the vrtest library in R.

I've used the test to reject geometric Brownian motion as a price process. Does that indicate that I have a mean reverting process or does it only indicate that the assumptions of geometric Brownian motion are not satisfied?

My plot of variance ratios looks like this: enter image description here

I don't quite understand the interpretation of this plot!

Note: I don't want to use a unit root test for stationarity because the process has nonconstant variance. It is not second order stationary although I believe that it is mean reverting.

share|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

It only indicates that the null hypothesis of uncorrelated increments is violated.

For the sake of simplicity, assume a time series is stationary. Then a sufficient statistic for arbitrary variance ratios is its covariance function. In general, a given deviation from the null can originate from different covariance functions, which in turn, entails that making any specific claim about mean reversion is not trivial. I find that this point is often overlooked in the financial literature. I expect that when phrased properly a similar statement can be made about non-stationary series.

That being said, mapping abnormal variance ratios to mean reversion/trend following is not impossible but it requires making specific assumptions about the alternative model.

share|improve this answer
I tend to agree with you. However, I found the following quote: "The mean values of the individual firm variance ratios are shown in Table 5. They suggest some long-horizon mean reversion for individual stock prices." Page 19 of albany.edu/faculty/faugere/PhDcourse/meanreversion1.pdf I'm having trouble understanding why certain variance ratios would imply mean reversion. – wcampbell Apr 5 '13 at 18:02
In the abstract of the same paper: "It demonstrates that variance ratios are among the most powerful tests for detecting mean reversion in stock prices." – wcampbell Apr 5 '13 at 18:05
I updated my answer to address some of your comments. – Ryogi Apr 5 '13 at 18:10
Ok, I'm satisfied now. Thanks! – wcampbell Apr 5 '13 at 18:15

of course you can use this test to elaborate on this matter. Basically this test measures the ratio of variance of series in period tn to n*variance of t preriod


in short:

  • constant ratio for random walk
  • increasing for series with trend
  • decreasing for mean reverting process, more decreasing (faster) - better mean reversion

enter image description here

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.