Take the 2-minute tour ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Have the exchanges disclosed their criteria?

Does anyone have a best guess based upon observations of volume (however you wish to define it)?

Please no qualitative answers.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

You are referring to the Penny Pilot Program. Only options whose premiums are quoted at a price less than \$3 may be eligible for penny increments, except for IWM, QQQ, and SPY, which are always quoted in pennies.

The list of permitted classes doesn't seem to come from specific volume criteria. Instead, the SEC and the exchanges together roll-out names in phases.

CBOE's proposal for mini-options gives some additional insight:

There is a price test for entry into the Penny Pilot Program which excludes “high premium” classes, which are defined as classes priced at $200 per share or higher at the time of selection.

This is why GOOG is not in the Penny Pilot Program, for example.

The best bet is to use the list of eligible classes from ISE or CBOE. Note that Rule 6.42 states, "the Penny Pilot shall expire on June 30, 2013".

share|improve this answer
    
Saw that but was wondering why BAC's in pennies. Was BAC added when it was trading ~ $3 and never taken off? I hope they let it expire. When volumes collapse, they'll finally move towards making it universal. –  user3232 Apr 5 '13 at 20:01
    
@JoeCoderGuy I don't see what you're referring to. The BAC options chain shows quotes below \$3 as sub-penny increments, and quotes above \$3 as nickle increments. (The \$3 rule is for premiums, not prices of the underlying.) –  chrisaycock Apr 5 '13 at 20:08
    
ah, woops. didn't read that too closely. still they're not giving it to the options with thin volume. i guarantee there's a correlation –  user3232 Apr 5 '13 at 20:21
up vote -1 down vote accepted

The first 13 were some pretty active securities, but they definitely weren't the most.

chrisaycock's noted $3 threshold undoubtedly plays a role, so does volume, but there's probably some sort of other political consideration (like "don't leave out the small caps!") that could be quantified.

It looks like, generally speaking, it's the highest dollar volume underlyings with most option premium volume under $3 as well as a few political choices here and there.

http://www.ise.com/assets/files/investors/Penny_Report.pdf


Fun facts from the link:

  1. Offered spread drops from 10c to 7c.
  2. Size at the offer drops 80%, but how is this a shock that everyone at the nickel can't play along at the penny?
  3. Depth drops 60%, so it looks like some came part of the way, and those who have no hope of ever getting their order filled went away.
  4. Quotes from market makers doubled. Looks like they like it.
  5. The part the exchange cares about most: volume increased 33% for PP stocks, 9% for no PP.
  6. The part the exchanges are afraid of the most: 25% increase in capacity needed to handle pennies.

I can't wait for the penny pilot to be over.

  1. Whoever actually drops out and only does nickels will get murdered by the last one(s) still doing pennies (NYSE/Arca looks pretty enthusiastic based upon their papers). We might watch CBOE take a huge hit to earnings and prestige if they're the only ones who bow out. Could be a funny day!
  2. The exponential rate (current average annual 74% rate) that underlyings have been added to the penny list will continue. We're at 362 pennies, 3215 total now, so it looks like it'll be ~4 years until totally ubiquitous.
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.