Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose we hedge an index option using futures on that index. How would the hedging strategy be different if the underlying could be traded directly (from a risk point of view)?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The differences essentially boil down to liquidity and pricing discrepancies between the underlying and the futures of the underlying.

  • With futures you have to consider basis risk which you obviously do not face if you can trade in the underlying directly.

  • Additionally, you need to roll futures contracts before they expire, hence you are faced with roll charges.

  • Also, depending on liquidity profiles, there are assets in the market where for specific reasons the derivative is more or less liquid than the underlying itself which may impact spreads and prices you pay/receive when trading them.

  • Another factor are financing charges: Some assets command higher or lower financing charges and borrow rates than their derivatives. Derivatives can most often be margined more cheaply than the cash underlying.

Those, in sum make up the differences and impact risk when considering whether or not to trade directly in the underlying or its derivative.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.