Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's a question pertaining to the correlation of a log asset process (following BM) and its time average, to put it into form, if

$$X(t)=\mu t+\sigma W(t)$$ then $$ \bar{X}(t):=\frac{1}{t}\int_0^tX(\tau)d\tau\,{\buildrel d \over =}\,\mu\frac{t}{2}+\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt3}W(t) $$ where we see that the mean and variance are $\mu t/2$ and $\sigma^2t/3$. Now I have a paper here (Path integral approach to Asian options in the Black–Scholes mode) that says that the correlation coefficient of $X$ and $\bar{X}$ is equal to $\sqrt3/2$...

Now if I do it from definition $$ \rho_{X(t),\bar{X}(t)}=\frac{Cov(\sigma W(t),\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt3}W(t))}{\sigma\sqrt t\frac{\sigma\sqrt t}{\sqrt3}}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{\sqrt3} Var(W(t))}{\frac{\sigma^2 t}{\sqrt3}}=1$$

So I guess I missed something somewhere, if anyone could give me his 2 cents... Thanks

share|improve this question
Where did you get the expression for $\bar{X}$? It doesen't seems right to me. – FKaria May 14 '13 at 8:46
From the same paper, it is pretty much a generic way to write the geometric average, sometimes the integrand is written as $\log(S_X(t))$, sometimes instead of writing it $\bar{X}$, it is $I$... – zebullon May 15 '13 at 1:43
It looks like you're assuming that if you have $X$ and $Y$ which are equal in distribution, then for any $Z$, $\text{cov}(X,Z) = \text{cov}(Y,Z)$. This isn't true in general. – quasi May 16 '13 at 0:16
up vote 2 down vote accepted

You want to work directly with $\overline{X}$, and not some other r.v. with the same distribution, since equivalence in distribution doesn't imply that correlation remains the same. For ease of notation, I'll assume that $\mu = 0$ and $\sigma = 1$. I claim that $$ \text{cov}\left(\overline{X},X \right) = \frac{1}{t} \int_0^t s \ ds. $$

Note that this is what you get if you calculated $\frac{1}{t} \int_0^t \text{cov}(W_s, W_t) \ ds$. For now, I will leave it to you to justify this step, but the approach you should take is 1) discretize the Riemann integral, and show that things work there, and 2) Use the Dominated Convergence Theorem to pass to the limit.

In any case, what we get is $$ \text{cov}\left(\overline{X},W_t \right) = \frac{1}{t} \cdot \frac{t^2}{2} = \frac{t}{2}. $$

Using your formula for the variance of $\overline{X}$, this leads to $$ \text{corr}(\overline{X},W_t) = \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{\sqrt{t}\cdot\frac{\sqrt{t}}{\sqrt{3}}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}. $$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.