Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to ask a question about random walk. Campbell, Lo & Mackinlay defined the random walk, in the following way (RW3):

$$ cov[f(r_{t}),g(r_{t+k})]=0,\qquad k\neq0 $$

for all $f(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$, where $f(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$ are linear functions, and $\{r_{t}\}$ is a series of returns. So, the question is about the following equation: $$ r_{t}=\alpha\varepsilon_{t-1}^{2}+\varepsilon_{t},\qquad\varepsilon_{t}\sim IID(0,\sigma^{2}). $$

Is it random walk or not? And why? (I have an idea, but i don't know, if it's true.)


share|improve this question
It is good practice here to share your idea, meaning: Show any work and progress that you have done/made yourself. – vonjd May 16 '13 at 15:52
$f(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$ can be written as $f(x)=ax+b$ and $g(y)=cy+d$ . Then, $$ cov[f(r_{t});g(r_{t+k})]=ac\alpha^{2}(E[\varepsilon_{t-1}^{2}\varepsilon_{t+k-1}‌​^{2}]-E[\varepsilon_{t-1}^{2}]E[\varepsilon_{t+k-1}^{2}])+ac\alpha(E[\varepsilon_‌​{t-1}^{2}\varepsilon_{t+k}]-E[\varepsilon_{t-1}^{2}]E[\varepsilon_{t+k}])+ac\alph‌​a(E[\varepsilon_{t}\varepsilon_{t+k-1}^{2}]-E[\varepsilon_{t}]E[\varepsilon_{t+k-‌​1}^{2}]) $$ If $k=\pm1$ , then it's $ac\alpha(E[\varepsilon_{t}^{3}])$ , else it's 0. So it can be only 0 if $E[\varepsilon_{t}^{3}]=0$ . – Daniel May 16 '13 at 18:28
Include this not as comment, but within the body of the question... – SRKX May 17 '13 at 8:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.