Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Some equities on European markets have options traded in two different exercise styles: American and European.


Consider constructing volatility surface for given equity with two set of options, when for each expiration/maturity there are two corresponding IV points (from European and American options respectively.)

How one in this case would construct the surface and what is the reasoning?

  • Using only one set of options (either European or American), chosen by some parameter (total volume, open interest, etc.)
  • Combining both sets
  • Something else
share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

If you can get anywhere close to the same open-interest and volume using European options as the corresponding American ones, you'll have a much easier time just using them.

American options with high probability of early exercise don't contain information about that back end of the vol surface, and it's kind of hard to decide just what to do with their implied vols. The only way you can be sure you've done it properly is to throw them all into some giant multivariate optimization algorithm on a parameterized volatility surface.

That said, if you're calibrating the vol surface to trade these same American options, rather than (say) to fit some exotics-pricing or risk model, then you had better calibrate to those American options.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.