Take the 2-minute tour ×
Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I often come across the following notation in my script, and I have not found it anywhere else. While our lecturer insists it is of utmost importance to write this way in his exams, he yet failed to explain why...


From a geometric Brownian motion $$ dX_t = \mu X_tdt+\sigma X_t dW_t $$ apply Ito to $$f(X_t,t) = ln X_t =: Y_t$$ and get

$$ dY_t = \frac{1}{X_t}dX_t - \frac{1}{2X_t^2}d[X]_t $$

Actual Question

Why is X in squared brackets in the second term of the RHS?

What is the specific background to write this way, and how is it different from other notations?

All texts I've worked with so far (pure finance, except Oksendal) were able to work without this. What am I missing here?

I appreciate your help!

share|improve this question
Well I assume it's his personal way of writing squared Brownian motions, however he never defines it. Does this notation by any convention carry additional information? –  phi Jul 2 '13 at 18:05
This is a standard notation for the quadratic variation of a stochastic process: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_variation –  olaker Jul 2 '13 at 20:36
For a local martingale there is a difference (in general) between $\langle M\rangle $ and $[M]$. The two processes coincide, if $M$ is continuous. –  user8 Jul 3 '13 at 8:14
Thank you olaker. I edited my answer accordingly for future reference. –  vonjd Jul 4 '13 at 9:48
Thanks to all of you! –  phi Jul 4 '13 at 12:56
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It is a notation for quadratic variation of a stochastic process.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.