Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to do a portfolio optimization with an expected shortfall constraint. For this, it is necessary to know the distribution of expected portfolio returns. When doing this empirically, my plan is to assume a small investment universe in which all assets' daily returns are known. If the portfolio is optimized with a 100-day moving horizon, then on day 101, I have 100 past returns for each asset, which would also allow me to get an estimate of each of their distributions. But if I now put them together in a portfolio, what is the way to determine the portfolio return distribution?

I thought about an application of the central limit theorem and then assume a normal distribution accordingly, but I will not have enough assets for this, and they will not be evenly weighted in the portfolio (in fact, the portfolio will be robust, therefore only quite few assets will have positive weights).

Alternatively, is it possible to take some defined distribution that is known to approximate portfolio returns more or less well, and then take this as a basis for the ES-calculation? I guess that normal and lognormal distribution both don't fit very well, so is there an alternative?

I'm planning to use stock indices as the assets in my universe.

share|improve this question

There is a formula for calculating ES from a normal distribution. There is also a formula for ES of arbitrary distributions using a Cornish-Fisher expansions (easy for univariate processes but frustrating for multivariate). However, the most common approach is a scenario representation of the distribution. This could include using the historical distribution or it could include estimating parameters to a distribution and simulating many times from it. The second approach is very arbitrary and gives you a lot of freedom to incorporate whatever non-normalities or time-varying properties you feel are important.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.