Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for finance professionals and academics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the Black (1976) model require the existence of the relation $F(t,T)=S(t)e^{r(T−t)}$?

I studied the derivation of the Black-Scholes formula. However, although I know the Black formula, I've never studied its entire derivation process. And probably the easiest way to justify the formula is using that relationship (something that motivates the previous question).

share|improve this question

No, the Black model does not require this relationship to hold. For example, futures on currencies exhibit a different relationship between the future and spot price because of the interest debit/credit nature of currency borrowed/lent. However for the Black model on European futures options to hold the following condition has to be met:

The product of the asset price probability distribution and the pricing kernel has to be log-normal.

It can be shown that the asset price probability distribution does not necessarily have to be log-normal but the above has to hold to price, for example specific stock options (such as European spot options), bond options (where bond prices are log-normal), and some of the interest rate options (where such interest rates follow a MSS-BGM process). The Libor Market Model (LMM) is actually just a special case of the Black model.

share|improve this answer
when you mention the asset price probability distribution, do you mean, in this case, the underlying futures contracts or the the underlying asset of the futures?? – Joao Serafim Aug 16 '13 at 11:44
@JoaoSerafim, I meant the asset on which the option is written, which could be a foreign exchange rate, a futures price or an interest rate,...please note that the risk-adjusted probability distribution of the above mentioned product has to be lognormal. – Matt Wolf Aug 16 '13 at 14:00
I see. I have another question relted to this subject. Let's suppose we have a future contract F in a market where the relation F(t,T)=S(t)er(T−t) doesn't hold. What are the the boundary conditions for the drivation of the Black formula?? – Joao Serafim Aug 19 '13 at 14:17
I've created a new post for this question. – Joao Serafim Aug 20 '13 at 4:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.