983 reputation
512
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 1 month
seen Feb 22 '13 at 11:56

Now I think my display name is cool!Let's keep it ;)

Google+ http://gplus.to/csyang


Oct
18
awarded  Disciplined
Oct
9
awarded  Nice Answer
Sep
16
comment Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
Thank you for accepting the answer, vonjd :) And thanks for your inspiring question. I always believe it's the smart questions and curiosity that lead us to great answers and ideas! I wish I could answer you more but I really favor short and inspiring answer in public. However, I am more than happy to discuss further in private :) Please feel free to contact me (Google/Linked) if you are interested in more discussions.
Sep
16
revised Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
added 184 characters in body
Sep
15
revised Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
added 84 characters in body
Sep
15
revised Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
added 84 characters in body
Sep
15
awarded  Critic
Sep
15
comment Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
Hello Tal, please keep your bounty. I am teasing myself :) As for your question, in my opinion, once you have sound underlying dynamics, replicating is trivial. To myself, my answer is complete enough, i.e. the information I suggest here is enough to solve vonjd's questions.
Sep
15
revised Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
added 104 characters in body
Sep
15
comment Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
Oh? The bounty reward was given away while I am posting my answer? I remember there are still few hours to go before the bounty deadline? :) Too bad I just back from a vocation!
Sep
15
answered Duality between constant rebalanced portfolio (CRP) and corresponding derivative
Aug
24
comment Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
Second, there is no contradiction to the common sense that 'pure independence = zero E[PnL]'. E[] > 0 in my example and your Parrondo's paradox is indeed exploited from sort of dependency. While Parrondo exploits the dependency between two losing games, mine is exploiting the dependency on my losing trades (which is less obvious). But (warn again), this is at cost of ruin risk! Note that Kelly/Vol-pump eliminate ruin risk, but still suffer tail risk. Conclusion? Find dependency had better, create it if you must.
Aug
24
comment Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
Thank you for accepting the answer, vonjd. I also like the analogy you found in Parrondo paradox. Though not sure how to answer your questions? here is my attempt: First, all mentioned strategies propose to add(cut) risk exposure when lose(win). For example, if you long stock and you lose/gain 1 dollar when market moves, kelly or vol-pump will require you buy/sell in order to maintain constant betting ratio. This makes volatility your friend (pumping). But trend is your enemy! In this case, is random walk more like your enemy or your friend?
Aug
22
revised Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
added 53 characters in body
Aug
20
revised How do I graphically represent the evolution of a covariance matrix over time?
Move and merge some comments to the answer
Aug
20
revised Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
deleted 26 characters in body
Aug
20
revised Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
deleted 26 characters in body
Aug
19
awarded  Editor
Aug
19
revised Proof that you cannot beat a random walk
edited body
Aug
19
answered Proof that you cannot beat a random walk