network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Italy | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 7 months |
| seen | Oct 5 '11 at 8:37 | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
Interested in finance.
|
Apr 20 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 18 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Oct 4 |
comment |
At what point does someone using technical analysis become a Quant? +1: thanks, starting to understand a bit the difference. Interesting book. I agree about the fact that most TA books are garbage. |
|
Oct 4 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Oct 3 |
comment |
At what point does someone using technical analysis become a Quant? @Tal Fishman: thanks for not closing the question, I updated the title. I saw wikipedia, but I still not understand the difference between Quant and Technical Analysis. In the Wikipedia section called Criticism they say: "...their credibility was damaged by the financial crisis of 2007–2010." That phrase makes me think at a Quant like a Technical Analyst with just a Ph.D in Math. But it sounds odd, the few Mathematicians I met never believe in somthing that can not be demonstrated with a Theorem, I can't imagine a Mathematician believieng in Technical Analysis (he probably even despises it). |
|
Oct 3 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 3 |
revised |
At what point does someone using technical analysis become a Quant? edited title |
|
Oct 3 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 3 |
asked | At what point does someone using technical analysis become a Quant? |
