| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 153 |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
How to enumerate all the possible portfolios with a given target volatility? @SRKX The algorithm I discussed would generate a potentially infinite number of portfolios. I would think you'd have to impose some kind of cardinality constraints (like you can't hold half a share of stock but only a full share) in order to obtain some kind of unique solution. But even then, I imagine the set of all potential portfolios to be quite large. |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
How to enumerate all the possible portfolios with a given target volatility? What if you just generated random portfolios, scaled their weights to 1, then blended that with the risk-free return to generate the target volatility? |
|
Dec 14 |
comment |
Control Bloomberg logins in a library Perhaps this is better directed to Bloomberg help? |
|
Dec 13 |
comment |
Missing factor in the factor model @Jase If you don't have much data, then the estimates may not be precise. As a practical matter it is easier to estimate in a Bayesian framework, which also imposes a computational burden. This makes backtesting take significantly longer. |
|
Dec 10 |
comment |
Monty Hall Model Not sure what the practical purpose of this is (regime-switching models of asset returns don't usually show much difference in the mean between regimes). Just think it through a second, if information comes out that the return on the market will be higher, would you try to take advantage of that, to the extent that the market will give you a fair price? |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Kalman Filter Equity Example I read a bit about how to use Particle Filters for on line Bayesian estimation. Don't understand all the math yet, but that might be a good enough reason to use them. |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
Kalman Filter Equity Example Some great resources there. I think I have a vague sense of how the particle filter works, but I don't find it very intuitive. That March 2003 talk says that PF is best for multi-modal or skewed pdfs (implying that EKF or UKF might be better otherwise). Any insight if you only want to use a Kalman filter with t distributed errors? |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Why are regressors squared and not ^1.5 or ^2.2 or ^2.5? Instead of performing a non-linear least squares routine, the researcher has effectively imposed constraints on the coefficient. They want to handle non-lineraities without too many extra variables. So they just square it. Parsimony. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Why are regressors squared and not ^1.5 or ^2.2 or ^2.5? The main reason is parsimony. |
|
Nov 30 |
comment |
Is there a piratebay for data(bases)? (here, talking about historical financial data) As far as I can tell, there's nothing more stopping anyone from putting up a torrent of financial databases than there is from torrents of movies/tv/etc. That being said, this site is for professionals, which suggests the question is off-topic, at a minimum. |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
How to make the final Interpretation of PCA? When not relying on Bayesian techniques, I can see the advantage of PCA for dimension reduction. Consider high-dimension estimation of the covariance matrix where the number of observations is smaller than the number of securities. This typically leads to problems. Alternately, VAR or Garch estimation on a small number of factors is usually faster with fewer parameters than estimating them on every security in the universe. |
|
Nov 27 |
comment |
Does entropy pooling apply to distributions with time-varying drift? You normally would simulate to $\widetilde{X}_{t+k}$ and apply EP to that. I'm saying simulate $\widetilde{X}_{t+1},\ldots,\widetilde{X}_{t+k}$ and concatenate them into one matrix $\widetilde{Y}\equiv\left[\begin{array}{ccc} \widetilde{X}_{t+1} & \cdots & \widetilde{X}_{t+k}\end{array}\right]$ and treat that as though it is one distribution. |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
portfolio optimization from empirical return distributions Since when does Monte Carlo only do that? |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
Missing factor in the factor model Not necessary. The returns on the index should explain a significant amount of the variation, but PCA can also help. |
|
Nov 17 |
comment |
Missing factor in the factor model I'd have to know more about what the data is like. |
|
Nov 16 |
comment |
Does mean reverting imply mean stationary? It is possible that he means covariance stationary. |
|
Nov 15 |
comment |
Where can I find corporate bond spreads? Ah, so what you really want would be like an A- yield curve to use that spread to price a hypothetical bond. If you have a sample of all A- bond yields, you could construct your own but I'm not sure what providers give something similar. |
|
Nov 15 |
comment |
Where can I find corporate bond spreads? Have you tried the YAS function? It should have the G-spread on there. |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Combining Mulitple Forecasts? Budged Constraints? Let's say you estimate $z_{t}=B_{1,0}+B_{1,1}*x_{t}+e_{1,t}$ and $z_{t}=B_{2,0}+B_{2,1}*y_{t}+e_{2,t}$ and make forecasts from each. The optimal combined forecast wouldn't be the sum of the forecasts, but some sort of weighted average. |
|
Nov 13 |
comment |
Combining Mulitple Forecasts? Budged Constraints? What you have done is constructed a time series of the form $z_{t}=x_{t}+y_{t}+e_{t}$ and then regressed $z_{t}$ against $x_{t}$ and $y_{t}$. Imagine instead you have some time series $z_{t}$, you fit an AR(1) model and obtain a forecast and then fit an AR(p) model and obtain a forecast. How you combine those two forecasts is a categorically different problem. |