| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | United States | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 5 months |
| seen | 2 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 33 |
quasi dot surely at gmail
|
May 17 |
comment |
Desired portfolio volume I would. The calculations unfortunately won't be as nice as with exponential utility, but doable. |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Desired portfolio volume An another approach is to use the power utility functions. This family of functions (which includes $\log x$), will have the property of constant relative risk aversion, meaning that a constant proportion of wealth will be invested. |
|
May 17 |
answered | Desired portfolio volume |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Desired portfolio volume Have you tried with exponential utility $U(x) = -e^{-\lambda x}$ and power utility $\frac{1}{p}x^p$? |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Exact value of mean reversion rate knowing terminal value of the process That's a linear ODE with a closed form solution. Have you tried using that? Solve it with separation of variables. |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Covariance of brownian motion and its time average added 7 characters in body |
|
May 16 |
answered | Covariance of brownian motion and its time average |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Covariance of brownian motion and its time average It looks like you're assuming that if you have $X$ and $Y$ which are equal in distribution, then for any $Z$, $\text{cov}(X,Z) = \text{cov}(Y,Z)$. This isn't true in general. |
|
May 15 |
comment |
How to prove that markets are incomplete under the Stochastic Volatility model? Can you show that there are multiple different equivalent martingale measures? Completeness is equivalent to the existence of a unique martingale measure. This is called 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing sometimes. |
|
May 13 |
comment |
characterization of coherent risk measures The property you want is true. Try rewriting your expectation under $Q$ as an expectation under $P$, using the Radon-Nikodym derivative $\frac{dQ}{dP}$. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rate Distortion Minimization in a Python Clustering Algorithm I guess I meant that now they're algebraically dependent. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rate Distortion Minimization in a Python Clustering Algorithm Right sorry, what you said is right. But your "observations" aren't independent now. Not sure how that will affect things. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rate Distortion Minimization in a Python Clustering Algorithm The naive application of the paper you cited seems to be: calculate $\Sigma$ as you did, then use the distortion measure to cluster the $d$-dimensional returns as a function of time. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rate Distortion Minimization in a Python Clustering Algorithm So I'm a little confused. You're using $\Sigma$ as your underlying data, with each row a data point. So you have $d$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. But in your dispersion calculation, you're not using the covariance matrix of $\Sigma$, you're using $\Sigma$ itself. This seems to not be the algorithm. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rate Distortion Minimization in a Python Clustering Algorithm any chance you could post your data? |
|
Apr 30 |
revised |
reasonable asymptotic elasticity in utility maximization (paper by Kramkov / Schachermayer) added 315 characters in body |
|
Apr 29 |
revised |
reasonable asymptotic elasticity in utility maximization (paper by Kramkov / Schachermayer) added 1007 characters in body |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
reasonable asymptotic elasticity in utility maximization (paper by Kramkov / Schachermayer) @hulik: Ok, the first question is explained in quite terrible detail. I'm still a little lazy on the second, but again, you will fill in the gaps using an argument like the first part. |
|
Apr 29 |
revised |
reasonable asymptotic elasticity in utility maximization (paper by Kramkov / Schachermayer) added 1007 characters in body |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
reasonable asymptotic elasticity in utility maximization (paper by Kramkov / Schachermayer) I'll try to clean things up for you in the next day or so. |