548 reputation
18
bio website twitter.com/experquisite
location Vancouver, Canada
age
visits member for 1 year, 10 months
seen 10 hours ago

Derivatives pricing in C++, automated trading in Scala.


13h
comment Is it important to equalize the minimum price fluctuation in pairs trading?
If your basket only has two contracts, then a linear regression on prices is fine. Some people attempt to trade the "ratio" of two prices, though, or trade flat 1:1 contracts, which is usually a mistake. There is always some debate whether one should be regressing prices or log-prices.
1d
comment Is it important to equalize the minimum price fluctuation in pairs trading?
I am not sure you need to account for the contract tick size, but you definitely need to account for differing variance or 'beta' of the two contracts.
Oct
27
comment How is stock data objectively different to this random walk?
Is your question "how are these plots objectively different [by eyeballing]?", or "is quantitative trading futile?" Stock market return distributions are very different from your generator, but that probably won't help you trying to trade them.
Oct
16
comment Importance sampling for barrier option like pricing by Monte carlo
You mean like references to importance sampling, control variates etc? I believe these topics were covered in Jackel's book amazon.com/Monte-Carlo-Methods-Finance-Jaeckel/dp/047149741X
Oct
1
comment Is it fair to assume $(ud=1)$ in the binomial tree option pricing model?
Right, my point is that there exist binomial models for non-recombining trees where your $ud=1$ condition doesn't hold, which still converge to a price as $\Delta t \rightarrow 0$.
Oct
1
comment Is it fair to assume $(ud=1)$ in the binomial tree option pricing model?
researchgate.net/publication/… seems to be regarding non-recombining binomial trees for options pricing, but I haven't read the paper.
Oct
1
comment Is it fair to assume $(ud=1)$ in the binomial tree option pricing model?
I'm pretty sure the condition for it to be convergent in the way you describe is just that the step size must be ~ $\sqrt{t}$. If you start assuming a log-normal process and constant volatility, that's when you start to get boxed into particular parameterizations.
Sep
30
comment Is it fair to assume $(ud=1)$ in the binomial tree option pricing model?
CRR's condition ud=1 leads to a recombinant tree, but binomial trees need not be recombinant, they are just much easier to calculate when they are.
Sep
27
answered Option pricing ? Where to get the dividend yield from?
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Sep
16
comment How to select optimal betting strategy from backtest?
To add, why not use a clustering algorithm on the resulting profitable parameter vectors and then select the point in the center of the largest cluster?
Sep
16
answered Why should we expect geometric Brownian motion to model asset prices?
Sep
13
comment Algo's Shadowing Limit Orders
I think you might mean "Lo and behold"
Sep
8
comment Basic question on LIBOR-OIS swap
Fed funds is the US overnight/OIS rate
Sep
7
answered Incoherence in Bloomberg Data in Swap Curve Builder (ICSV)
Sep
6
comment Efficient Markets Paradox
Indeed. I think most of the emh stuff assumes a rational convex utility function over wealth, which is most likely not the case for most people. Eric Falkenstein has been a proponent of relative wealth utility functions being more likely, which leads to a much different landscape.
Aug
28
answered Algorithm to detect the aggressor side of a trade
Aug
22
comment ADR vs Foriegn Stock Price Arbitraguers
fordschool.umich.edu/rsie/workingpapers/Papers526-550/r533.pdf is a study of this mechanism of evading capital controls.
Aug
22
comment ADR vs Foriegn Stock Price Arbitraguers
That concurs better with the current unofficial rate: twitter.com/SoberLook/status/501082814260211712 Perhaps people are using the ADR to get USD out of the country somehow?
Aug
21
comment What is the reasoning to derive this financial model called the Vasicek Model?
As I understand it, it was a pretty basic rationale - the short interest rate is mean-reverting, and they just supposed Gaussian diffusion. The OU process was well-known, tractable, so why not?