3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to get some advice or direction (brainstorm) as to the best way to summarise/cluster/etc. the equity fund universe (which for my purposes consists of about 150 funds).

Some of my ideas at current:

-I have access to a Value and Growth Index so could perhaps try segregate funds into value/momentum/growth groups by looking at their betas to these indices. Could also do the same to estimate the funds' exposures to certain sectors: Large Cap, Mid Cap, Small Cap; Resources, Financials, Industrials; etc.

-regression on index to see which funds are closet benchmark trackers (or look at tracking error)

-maybe PCA on the equity fund universe to see which funds are more dissimilar to universe...

I am really just looking for several ways of analysing the funds and try to get some groupings or measures of similarity between the funds. Any pointers of what to read up on or suggestions would be appreciated

PS: I would be using R for this work so if there are any R-specific libraries to look at then please notify

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ perhaps look into k-means clustering? $\endgroup$
    – bcf
    Nov 17, 2015 at 14:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The "BEST" way will strongly depend on what you want to achieve by this. You can analyse funds by cost, by past performance by active share by fund management company and so on and so on. So what are your goals when clustering? $\endgroup$
    – g g
    Jun 15, 2016 at 13:01

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Capital IQ has an existing classifications by asset class, country, family, method, region, sector, size, and style. These definitely are not clever classifications, but form the baseline for fund taxonomy.

  • AssetClass
    Alternative   ALTERN
    Commodities   COMMOD
    Currencies    CURR
    Equity    EQUITY
    Fixed Income  FIXINC
    Mixed Assets  MIXASST
    
  • country follows ISO standards
  • Family

    BLDRS BLDRS
    Claymore  CLAYMORE
    Currency Shares (Rydex)   CURRENCY
    Direxion  DIREXION
    Exchange Traded Notes ETNS
    First Trust   FTRUST
    FocusShares   FOCUS
    HealthShares  HEALTHSH
    HOLDRS    HOLDRS
    iShares   ISHARES
    Macro Shares  MACROSH
    Market Vectors    MVECTORS
    Miscellaneous MISCL
    NETS (Northern Trust) NETS
    PowerShares   POWERSH
    ProShares PROSH
    Realty Funds  REALTY
    RevenueShares REVSH
    Rydex RYDEX
    SPA   SPA
    SPDR  SPDR
    TDX Independence  TDX
    United States Trust   USTRUST
    Vanguard  VANGUARD
    Wisdom Tree   WISDOM
    
  • Method

Hedged    HEDGED
Leveraged Long    LEVLONG
Leveraged Short   LEVSHORT
Quant Model   QUANT
Special Weights   SPWEIGHTS
Standard Long STANLONG
Standard Short    STANSHORT
  • Region
Asia  ASIA
BRIC-Chindia  BRIC
Developed DEVELOP
Emerging  EMERG
Europe    EUROPE
Global    GLOBAL
Global Ex US  GLOBALXUS
Latin America LATIN
MidEast-Africa    MIDEAST
North America NAMERICA
Pacific Ex Japan  PACIFIC
  • Sector
Agriculture   AGRIC
Alternate Energy  ALTENERGY
Consumer  CONSUMER
Energy    ENERGY
Financial FINANCIAL
General   GENSECT
Healthcare    HEALTHCAR
Housing   HOUSING
Industrials   INDUST
Infrastructure    INFRASTR
Materials MATERIALS
Municipal fixed inc   MUNIS
Precious Metals   PRECIOUS
Real Estate   REALEST
Resources (General)   RESOURC
Services  SERVICES
Social    SOCIAL
Special Theme SPECIAL
Taxable Fixed Inc TXFIXINC
Technology    TECHNOL
Telecomm  TELECOMM
Timber    TIMBER
Transportation    TRANSPORT
Utilities UTILITIES
Water WATER
  • Size
General   GENSIZE
Large-Mega    ETF_LARGECAP
Mid   ETF_MIDCAP
Small-Micro   ETF_SMALLCAP
  • Style
Equity Income EQINCOME
General   GENSTYLE
General Fixed Inc GENFIXINC
Growth    GROWTH
High Yield Fixed Inc  HIGHYLD
Intermediate Fixed Inc    INTFIXINC
Long Fixed Inc    LTFIXINC
Short Fixed Inc   STFIXINC
Value VALUE
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

for model construction purposes, I would suggest factor analysis or PCA. Have a look at EM algorithm

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The EM algorithm is rather general. You mean EM-clustering. Would usual clustering (k-means, hyrarchical) do the same? Which distance measure would you propose? $\endgroup$
    – Richi Wa
    Mar 17, 2016 at 8:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.