Timeline for Is it possible to understand financial theory without mathematics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2014 at 0:27 | comment | added | FKaria | You realize that it doesn't have to be that way. Mathematics are a tool that allows you to formalize and be precise about what you mean. I personally understand any concept much better when someone writes some math. Before than that, everything looks fuzzy or arbitrary. Mathematics are a great tool to have and understand, and I feel that is responsibility of the professor to translate that intuition to mathematics. In other words, if you can explain something without the maths, you can explain the same with the maths (unless you don't understand them) and it will be even better. | |
| Feb 12, 2014 at 17:47 | answer | added | vonjd | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 12, 2014 at 16:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackQuant/status/433640249831718912 | ||
| Feb 12, 2014 at 12:24 | answer | added | user1157 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 12, 2014 at 10:30 | history | edited | quis est ille |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 12, 2014 at 10:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 12, 2014 at 10:42 | |||||
| Feb 12, 2014 at 9:58 | history | asked | quis est ille | CC BY-SA 3.0 |