Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackQuant/status/454531762904133632
edited tags; edited title
Link
SRKX
  • 11.2k
  • 4
  • 42
  • 84

Quant relevant What quant-related functionalities R is R lacking compared to commercial software like Mathematica and Matlab?

edited title
Link
vonjd
  • 27.7k
  • 11
  • 103
  • 167

Quant relevant functionalities R is lacking compared to commercial sofrwaresoftware like Mathematica and Matlab

added 48 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Quanti
  • 203
  • 1
  • 6

Is Quant relevant functionalities R a viable alternativeis lacking compared to MatLab orcommercial sofrware like Mathematica? and Matlab

R that originated as a purely statistical tool has meanwhile blossomed into a comprehensive workbench for different tasks.

I I am familiar with Mathematica and don't like how it forces a license on you. Also the handling of big data and outputting of tables isins quite cumbersome in my opinion.

Meanwhile R offers via different packages (on top ofbeside the classic statistical tools) via different packages

  • Some support for object oriented coding approach
  • Monte Carlo generators galore
  • Optimization packages
  • Numerical Integration

Are there still areas whereWhat functionalities is R can’t compete with the big players still lacking that one needs for everyday quant work? Here "functionalities" also encompass interfaceablity with C++, C#, speed and ease of use.

Is R a viable alternative to MatLab or Mathematica?

R that originated as a purely statistical tool has meanwhile blossomed into a comprehensive workbench for different tasks.

I am familiar with Mathematica and don't like how it forces a license on you. Also the handling of big data and outputting of tables is quite cumbersome in my opinion.

Meanwhile R offers via different packages (on top of the classic statistical tools)

  • Some support for object oriented coding approach
  • Monte Carlo generators galore
  • Optimization packages
  • Numerical Integration

Are there still areas where R can’t compete with the big players ?

Quant relevant functionalities R is lacking compared to commercial sofrware like Mathematica and Matlab

R that originated as a purely statistical tool has meanwhile blossomed into a comprehensive workbench for different tasks. I am familiar with Mathematica and don't like how it forces a license on you. Also the handling of big data and outputting of tables ins quite cumbersome in my opinion.

Meanwhile R offers (beside the statistical tools) via different packages

  • Some support for object oriented coding approach
  • Monte Carlo generators galore
  • Optimization packages
  • Numerical Integration

What functionalities is R still lacking that one needs for everyday quant work? Here "functionalities" also encompass interfaceablity with C++, C#, speed and ease of use.

added 10 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
SRKX
  • 11.2k
  • 4
  • 42
  • 84
Loading
Source Link
Quanti
  • 203
  • 1
  • 6
Loading