Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:11 comment added Lisa Ann You should not compare the help manual of an expensive solution like MATLAB with the open source environment of R, quite a miracle considering results that have been produced standardizing efforts from hundreds of users. I would be really shocked to know that MATLAB support manual was worse than R's one, in that case something'd be really going wrong... for MathWorks.
Apr 5, 2014 at 23:56 comment added uday would agree with Joshua that R manuals at least these days are better than Stata's. But yes, far behind Matlab's manuals. The key difference is Matlab gives an example for each and every optional variable and parameter while R documentation doesn't. For an advanced user, however, the documentation is least of the worry!
Apr 5, 2014 at 17:38 comment added user2763361 -1 because the documentation is usually very good and the community is active and expert.
Apr 5, 2014 at 13:26 history edited Aksakal almost surely binary CC BY-SA 3.0
added 954 characters in body
Apr 5, 2014 at 7:43 comment added Probilitator For the larger packages the authors often provide PDF-files that work as a documentation. There are also a lot of books on R for different fields of application
Apr 4, 2014 at 17:27 comment added Joshua Ulrich That's true. Too bad the help pages don't have examples showing you how to use them...
Apr 4, 2014 at 17:11 comment added Aksakal almost surely binary R's help is pretty much useless unless you know how the function works already
Apr 4, 2014 at 16:45 comment added Joshua Ulrich R manuals/documentation are worse than Stata? No way. I was forced to use Stata 11 at a prior employer and the manuals and help pages were absolutely atrocious. The documentation that ships with base R is generally very good. The same can't be said for all 5000+ packages on CRAN, but at least you have the source code to inspect. You don't have that with Stata, SAS, Matlab, or OxMetrics.
Apr 4, 2014 at 15:31 history answered Aksakal almost surely binary CC BY-SA 3.0