Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 2, 2022 at 21:24 comment added randomwalker Can m3 be written in matrix form instead of nested summations?
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://quant.stackexchange.com/ with https://quant.stackexchange.com/
Aug 9, 2011 at 23:53 comment added Derek Ploor I've just taken a quick look. The differences in the correlations (co-moments) in that paper are that it presents an estimator that uses constant co-moments, which greatly reduces the dimensionality of the problem for large portfolios.
Aug 9, 2011 at 17:46 comment added Pasha Thank you for your quick reply in this paper "improved estimates of higher-order comoments and implications for portfolio selection" by Lionel Martellini, Volker Ziemann as I understand they use correlations and calculate them differently...( if you just search the name of the paper in google it is second one offered by the google, sorry I don't now hot to cite paper in the comment. Regards, Pasha
Aug 9, 2011 at 14:58 comment added Derek Ploor Correlations aren't needed explicitly, but come into play in calculating the m_2 moment. A covariance matrix is used to calculate the portfolio variance, sigma_p^2. Covariance_ij = Correlation_ij * sigma_i * sigma_j
Aug 9, 2011 at 13:47 comment added Pasha One more thing what about correlations between assets? should they be considered in skewness of portfolio??
Aug 8, 2011 at 15:30 comment added Pasha Thank you it is really useful.. One difference in return calculation I calculated returns as R(t)= Ln(P(t)-ln(P(t-1)).. hope this will not affect overall result.. Thank you for your detailed explanation..
Aug 8, 2011 at 4:03 history edited Derek Ploor CC BY-SA 3.0
Updated answer to address further questions from the OP
Aug 2, 2011 at 12:48 history answered Derek Ploor CC BY-SA 3.0