Timeline for How to identify technical analysis chart patterns algorithmically?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 18:09 | comment | added | drobertson | Umm, anything not random implies some form of arbitrage. Worse than random would be wonderful. Unless of course, the market is actually a malevolent beast looking to analyze what you do and specifically inflict pain on any choice you make. In that case, a lot of people whom I dismiss as paranoid would actually be right. | |
| Sep 18, 2011 at 14:53 | comment | added | Vishal Belsare | Worse than random . . . hmm . . . worth shorting? :p | |
| Sep 16, 2011 at 6:21 | history | edited | NPE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Sep 15, 2011 at 22:28 | comment | added | Tal Fishman | Another good reference which has been mentioned in the previous questions. On head-and-shoulders, Aronson writes "in a word, the pattern hailed as a cornerstone of charting is a bust." Trading based on head-and-shoulders proved to be worse than random. Aronson also cites the paper by Lo et al in that section. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 22:22 | history | answered | NPE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |