In stochastic calculus, only stochastic integrals are defined. The differential form is just a notation. That is, $$dF=g(t)dW_t$$ is just another expression for the integral $$F=\int_0^t g(s) dW_s.$$ See, for example, in this book, all Ito's lemmas are expressed as an integral form.

For your question, note that $F$ is not a function of $t$ and $W_t$, that is, it is not of the form $F(t, W_t)$. In fact, it depends on the whole path of $W_s$ from $0$ to $t$. Then Ito's lemma can not be applied to $F$. The application for both of your questions are incorrect.

In stochastic calculus, only stochastic integrals are defined. The differential form is just a notation. That is, $$dF=g(t)dW_t$$ is just another expression for the integral $$F=\int_0^t g(s) dW_s.$$ See, for example, in this book or this book, all Ito's lemmas are expressed in integral forms.

For your question, note that $F$ is not a function of $t$ and $W_t$, that is, it is not of the form $F(t, W_t)$. In fact, it depends on the whole path of $W_s$ from $0$ to $t$. Then Ito's lemma can not be applied to $F$. The application for both of your questions are incorrect.

In stochastic calculus, only stochastic integrals are defined. The differential form is just a notation. That is, $$dF=g(t)dW_t$$ is just another expression for the integral $$F=\int_0^t g(s) dW_s.$$ See, for example, in this book, all Ito's lemmas are expressed as an integral form.

For your question, note that $F$ is not a function of $t$ and $W_t$, that is, it is not of the form $F(t, W_t)$. In fact, it depends on the whole path of $W_s$ from $0$ to $t$. Then Ito's lemma can not be applied to $F$. The application for you both of your questions are incorrect.

In stochastic calculus, only stochastic integrals are defined. The differential form is just a notation. That is, $$dF=g(t)dW_t$$ is just another expression for the integral $$F=\int_0^t g(s) dW_s.$$ See, for example, in this book, all Ito's lemmas are expressed as an integral form.

For your question, note that $F$ is not a function of $t$ and $W_t$, that is, it is not of the form $F(t, W_t)$. In fact, it depends on the whole path of $W_s$ from $0$ to $t$. Then Ito's lemma can not be applied to $F$. The application for both of your questions are incorrect.