Timeline for How to count [and report] the values of significance at 1% and 5%?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2019 at 0:36 | comment | added | Pierre Bonaparte | Hi @noob2 I thought the same. To be honest the previous literature always reported much higher numbers for 5%. Thus I was under the impression that perhaps my reflection of the results is erroneous in a way [or confusing]. | |
| Jan 27, 2019 at 0:33 | comment | added | nbbo2 | In my opinion the second method is right: you have 142 cases that are significant at the 5% level. The number drops to 120 under the stricter criterion of 1% significance. | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 23:45 | history | asked | Pierre Bonaparte | CC BY-SA 4.0 |