Skip to main content

Timeline for interest rate swap: PV01 vs DV01

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 15 at 8:47 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
May 26 at 18:23 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Sep 24, 2023 at 14:28 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 207 characters in body
Sep 22, 2023 at 7:09 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 368 characters in body
Mar 4, 2021 at 22:53 comment added Attack68 but note that definition would change the PV of the swap since a floating leg cashflow does not reference continuously compounded rates
Feb 13, 2021 at 8:37 comment added Attack68 if $v_i = e^{-\sum_{k=1}^{i}d_k r_k}$ where $r_k$ is a continuously compounded rate then yes it is exact.
Feb 12, 2021 at 20:31 comment added Confounded Is $\frac{\partial v_i}{\partial r_j} = d_j v_i$ in fact exact for continuously compounded forwards? Thank you
Dec 24, 2020 at 19:21 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 63 characters in body
Nov 18, 2019 at 17:17 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 9, 2019 at 8:02 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 126 characters in body
Nov 8, 2019 at 23:12 vote accept gregV
Nov 8, 2019 at 23:12 vote accept gregV
Nov 8, 2019 at 23:12
Nov 8, 2019 at 19:05 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 5 characters in body
Nov 8, 2019 at 18:59 history edited Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 885 characters in body
Nov 8, 2019 at 18:38 history answered Attack68 CC BY-SA 4.0