When I am reading papers (ie here and here) on bootstrapping discount curves they refer to obtaining discount factors from rates for swaps maturing less than a year with:
$$D(t, T_i) = \frac{1}{1+s_i(T_i-t)}$$
(where $s_i$ is the swap rate, $T_i-t$ is the time to maturity in years and $D$ is the discount factor)
In short my question is why not this?:
$$D(t, T_i) = \frac{1}{(1+s_i)^{(T_i-t)}}$$
Is the difference because we are assuming there is no compounding? Is this a correct assumption? It's quite a key question because the denominator in the bootstrapping formula for tenors > 1 year (because the ois swaps pay annually) depends on this:
$$ D(0,T_i) = \frac{1-s_i\sum_{j=1}^{i-1}(T_j-T_{j-1})D(0,T_j)}{1+s_i(T_i-T_{i-1})} $$