3
$\begingroup$

If we have a coupon bearing Bond and want to calculate it's Yield then what is the standard practice to determine the Compounding frequency of Yield?

Is it always considered as Continuously compounded? or the compounding frequency matches with the Interest payment's frequency?

Appreciate for any pointer.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

Almost always, the market convention is to use for yield the same frequency as the coupon payment frequency.

However in a few markets, the market convention is to convert this yield to the frequency of the local government bond. For example, if the local government bonds usually pay annually, as they do in Eurozone, and some corporate bond pays quarterly or semi-annually, then you annualize the latter bond's yield, so it is easier to compare with the rest of the universe. Conversely, U.S. treasury debt (notes and bonds) and U.K. gilts pay semi-annual coupons, so the yield of GBP bonds having other frequencies are often quoted as semi-annual, so that, e.g., spread over benchmark is more meaningful.

If you have access to Bloomberg terminal, look for the field 'conventional yield frequency', which contains this frequency (periodicity) conventionally used to quote this bond's yield.

However I have never seen any bond for which the convention would be convert the yield to continuous compounding.

I suggest you read this paper on gilts to get a good feeling for price-yield conventions.

Edit: Also in a few markets, the market conventions even for a yield of bonds that don't pay coupons is to use compounding anyway. For example, LTNs in Brazil have no coupons, have had maturities up to 5 years, their yield are conventionally quoted using annual compounding. There are non-coupon-paying bonds in Eurozone (example) whose yield is likewise quoted using annual compounding.

If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are frequencies (1 - annual, 2 - semiannual, 4 - quarterly, 12 - monthly...), and $y_{f_1}$ and $y_{f_2}$ denote the yields corresponding to these frequencies, then ${\left(1+\frac{y_{f_1}}{f_1}\right)}^{f_1}={\left(1+\frac{y_{f_2}}{f_2}\right)}^{f_2}$, so I think $y_{f_2} = \left(\left(1+\frac{y_{f_1}}{f_1} \right)^{\frac{f_1}{f_2}} -1 \right)\times {f_2} $ (check my algebra before using) - higher frequency quotes lower yield.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I’d add that in a portfolio context, semiannual compounding is standard so you can roll up an apples to apples comparison for portfolio level statistics. Semiannual is the standard choice as mentioned by Dmitri because most governments issue SA cpns. It is also commonly used for quoting spreads to a benchmark treasury bond- you don’t want to subtract yields calculated with different frequencies. $\endgroup$
    – Bond wiz
    Commented Sep 3, 2020 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the helpful comment! In Eurozone, most government debt pays annually (examples DE0001135473, DE0001102341 bunds, FR0000571218 oat) but some EUR corporates are semi-annual et al. Hungary used to issued SA government debt, then switched new issuarnce to annual, used to quoted old bonds annualized for consistency, until they matured.Also, an example of zero-coupon bund DE0001102408 - yield quoted using annual compounding. $\endgroup$
    – Dimitri Vulis
    Commented Sep 3, 2020 at 15:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My US bias is showing badly here.....thanks for the info $\endgroup$
    – Bond wiz
    Commented Sep 3, 2020 at 16:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.