1
$\begingroup$

I used a simple market model (Black 76) to price an american swaption.

It's a formula similar to B&S, with another numeraire and forward rate as underlying.

I used the SDE: $$ dF = \sigma * F dW $$

Now I want to price a contract wich is the sum of 4 swaptions with different Tenors, so I have to simulate 4 forward rates.

Should I take into account the correlation between the forward rate or can I simply simulate the rates independently ?

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ @Imorin why would you need to simulate at all - Black's formula offers a closed form solution !! for swaption prices $\endgroup$ May 25, 2014 at 8:52
  • $\begingroup$ Thus the price of your contract would just be the sum of the four swaption prices calculated via Black's formula. You might need to get different vols in case of different maturities. $\endgroup$ May 25, 2014 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ I use simulation to price an american swaption $\endgroup$ May 25, 2014 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ do use finite differences or monte-carlo least squares or a tree ? $\endgroup$ May 25, 2014 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ you should perhaps complement you question by mentioning that you are pricing american-style swaption. Otherwise most people we react as I did $\endgroup$ May 25, 2014 at 15:53

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The filtration is hardly the problem.

Let's say you want to price a 1x4 and a 2x3 years swaption. Thus you model three forward rates $L(t,T_1,T_2), L(t,T_2, T_3), L(t,T_3,T_4)$

The swaprate $S_{\alpha,\beta}(t)$ depends on the forward rates $L_i(t,T_{i-1},T_i)$ with $i \in (\alpha+1, \dots, \beta)$

Thus the price of the 1x4 swaption given by $P(0,T_1)E^1[(S_{1,4}(T_1)-K)^+]$. Under the $Q^1$ measure only one rate can have the log-normal dynamics !! Thus you can't just model the three forward rates as log-normal !!!!

What you can do however is to directly model the swap rates $S_{1,4}, S_{2,4}$. You can assume log-normal dynamics for both and simulate them with whatever correlation structure you think is plausible. In this case you can also just add the expectations.

Whether you model the rates as correlated or not depends on your market data !! Obviously the correlation structure will have an effect on the price.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I may have mixed L and S... $\endgroup$ May 26, 2014 at 20:24
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand why there is a difference between modelling S and L. Why Under the Q1 measure only one (forward ?) rate can have the log-normal dynamics ? $\endgroup$ May 26, 2014 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ the swap rate is different quantity than the forward rate (but they coincide in case of a one period swap) Perhaps this can help: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/… $\endgroup$ May 27, 2014 at 7:08
  • $\begingroup$ The difference is clear now, but not the reason why $S_{i,j}$ could all be log normal but not the $L_{i,j}$ $\endgroup$ May 27, 2014 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ both can - but with the $S_ij$ each swap-rate could be modelled as being log normal. You can however model only one forward rate as log normal if you want to price swaption by simulating forward rates $\endgroup$ May 27, 2014 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.