I wanted to quickly confirm some simple calculations for the Black 76 greeks and was making use of the formulas on this website:


I have an issue with their statement of Rho and I wanted to check with you guys. Their version for a call has:

$$\rho = \tau e^{-r\tau}K\Phi(d_2)$$

Whereas I feel it should be:

$$\rho = \tau e^{-r\tau}(K\Phi(d_2) - F \Phi(d_1))$$


$$\rho = - \tau C$$

Where $C$ is the Black76 call option price:

$$C = e^{-r\tau}(F \Phi(d_1) - K\Phi(d_2))$$

Would really appreciate your input as the one person to post on my comment disagrees with me!


I agree with you. In the setting of Black 76 we consider an option on a forward/futures price $F$. $F$ is modelled as geometric Brownian motion and in contrast to the usual BM model the futures price does not grow with the risk-less rate.

Then you formula for the call (C) is correct. Note that in general neither $F$, $d_1$ nor $d_2$ contain the term $r$. Then taking the derivative w.r.t. $r$ we arrive at your formula.

In the case where the forward price can be found by cost-of-carry pricing (e.g. options on equity indices things simplify because then $$F_t = S_0 \exp((r-q)t),$$ which simplifies further if $q=0$ Then the $r$ terms cancles out but then in fact we are back in the BS model. Thus I would say: if cost-of-carry in the sense of the above formula holds, then Black-Scholes and Black 76 are just the same thing.

In the example pf VIX-futures cost-of-carry does not hold and one needs B76 (if one wants to model VIX-futures as GBM which is debateable).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.