4
$\begingroup$

Let $W_t$ be a Wiener process. It is clear to me that $dW_t$ is of size $\sqrt{dt}$. This can be seen because $$ \mathrm{Var}(W_{t+\Delta} - W_{t})=\Delta. $$ But am I allowed to actually write $(dW_t)^2 = dt$? It looks a bit silly... you have the square of a random variable on the left hand side, and a deterministic variable on the right hand side.

Please can you clarify whether this is right or wrong and perhaps give an explanation for this peculiar identity.

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

I can clarify 100% that $(dw)^2$= $dt$ and recommend you to accept it as a fact.

Like any other differential, this differential is defined in terms of its integral: $$ \int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}(dW)^{2}\equiv\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}[W(t_{k+1})-W(t_{k})]^{2} $$ Where $t_{k}=t_{0}+k(t_{1}-t_{0})/n$. Since $$ W(t_{k+1})-W(t_{k})=\sqrt{t_{k+1}-t_{k}}\xi_{k}=\sqrt{\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}}\xi_{k} $$ We have $$ \int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}(dW)^{2}\equiv\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\xi_{k}^{2} $$ where $\xi_{0}, \xi_{1},$ . . $\xi_{n-1}$ are independent $N(0,1)$ variables. Clearly the mean ofthe sum is $$ E[\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\xi_{k}^{2}]=\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}E[\xi_{k}^{2}]=t_{1}-t_{0} $$ Since the $\xi$'s are independent, the variance ofthe sum is $$ Var[\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\xi_{k}^{2}]=\frac{(t_{1}-t_{0})^{2}}{n^{2}}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}Var[\xi_{k}^{2}]=\frac{(t_{1}-t_{0})^{2}}{n^{2}}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}E[(\xi_{k}^{2}-1)^{2}] $$ For unit Gaussian variables, $E[(\xi_{k}^{2}-1)^{2}]=2$, so the variance ofthe sum works out to $$ Var[\frac{t_{1}-t_{0}}{n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\xi_{k}^{2}]=\frac{2}{n}(t_{1}-t_{0})^{2} $$ Thus $$ \int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}(dW)^{2}\equiv\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}S_{n} $$ where the sum $S_{n}$ has mean $t_{1}-t_{0}$ and variance $O(1/n)$ . We conclude that in the limit

$ n\rightarrow\infty$, this integral is $t_{1}-t_{0}$ with certainty. Thus $$ \int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}(dW)^{2}=t_{1}-t_{0} $$

For any $t_0$ and $t_1$. Since differentials are defined only in terms of their integral, we can rewrite it as

$(dw)^2 = dt$

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Like any other differential, this differential is defined in terms of its integral - that's a bit of an overstatement. It certainly is the case for most of stochastic differentials, but in real analysis the basic differential on a real line is often defined formally way before integrals. $\endgroup$ – Ilya Nov 9 '14 at 13:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.