I'm new to local volatility model.

From Dupire's paper and most of the textbooks, they derived the local volatility $\sigma(K, T)$ in the $(K, T)$ (i.e., strike and maturity) space, from call prices or the implied volatility surface.

However, by definition, local volatility is a function in terms of $(S_t, t)$, i.e., instantaneous underlying price and time.

How to relate these two?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The strike prices are values that the stock price may reach. Both strike and stock prices are in the same unit of measure, but of course are different variables/parameters. I find it coherent. $\endgroup$
    – Arrigo
    Commented Jan 26, 2015 at 11:57

3 Answers 3


This is merely a question of notation, you should simply read $$ \sigma(K,T) = \sigma(S_t=K, t=T) $$

For an easy to follow derivation see this excellent note from Fabrice Rouah

Some intuition behind the developments:

  • The price of a European option, for instance a call, can be written in integral form: $$ C(t, S_t, K, T) = e^{-r(T-t)} \int_0^\infty (S_T-K)^+ \phi(S_T,T; S_t, t) dS_T \tag{1} $$ where $\phi(S_T=S,T;S_t,t) := f(S,T)$ figures the pdf of moving from the known current state $(S_t,t)$ to some future state $(S_T=S,T)$. This is a model free result.
  • Now, consider a local volatility dynamics $$\frac{dS_t}{S_t} = \mu(S_t,t) dt + \sigma(S_t,t) dW_t$$ it is well-known that the conditional pdf $\phi(S_T=S,T;S_t,t) = f(S,T)$ in that case solves the following equation (Kolmogorov forward or Fokker-Planck equation): $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial T}f(S,T) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial S} \left[ \mu(S,T) f(S,T) \right] + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial S^2} \left[ \sigma^2(S,T) f(T,S) \right] \tag{2} $$ with initial condition $$f(S,t) = \phi(S_T=S,T=t; S_t, t) = \delta(S-S_t)$$ where we used the notation $$ \sigma^2(S,T) = \sigma^2(S_t=S,t=T) $$

  • Writing the time derivative of $(1)$ with respect to $T$, one can make $\frac{\partial}{\partial T}f(S,T)$ appear. This is useful, since we can now replace its expression given by $(2)$, meaning we have related some (time) derivative of the call price to our local volatility function $\sigma(.,.)$

  • The expression we get can be further simplified by identifying the spatial derivatives of the call price given by $(1)$. This involves computing space integrals, where the local volatility function ends up being evaluated at $S=K$, and finally yields the famous Dupire stripping formula $$ \sigma^2(K,T) = ... $$


The local volatility is just a $\mathbb{R}_+\times[0,T]\mapsto \mathbb{R}_+$ function where $T$ is some time horizon. It is the solution of a simple equation so it expression is written as $\sigma(K,t)$ but here $K$ is essentially a notation to denote a strike value as the Dupire equation relates the function $\sigma$ to vanilla market prices at a given strike. Once computed (calibrated) the local volatility function is used during the diffusion of the underlying asset so we evaluate it at pair $(S_t,t)$


It is probably worth pointing out that the cited article by Rouah has a serious typo/error. Namely, the quoted result in equation 3 is wrong: \begin{equation*} v_L=\frac{\frac{\partial w}{\partial T}}{\left[1-\frac{y}{w}\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}+\frac{1}{4}\left(-\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{w}+\frac{y^2}{w}\right)\left(\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right)^2\right]} \end{equation*} instead of \begin{equation*} v_L=\frac{\frac{\partial w}{\partial T}}{\left[1-\frac{y}{w}\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}+\frac{1}{4}\left(-\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{w}+\frac{y^2}{w^2}\right)\left(\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right)^2\right]}. \end{equation*} Unfortunately the wrong equation is also the equation which is "derived" in the body of the article.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No they aren't - the wrong one has a $y^2/w$ in the fourth term of the denominator whereas the correct one has $y^2/w^2$ $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 1, 2022 at 10:43
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. My apologies. $\endgroup$
    – nbbo2
    Commented Aug 1, 2022 at 11:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.