4
$\begingroup$

Consider Hull White model $dr(t)=[\theta(t)-\alpha(t)r(t)]dt+\sigma(t)dW(t)$ when we solve the SDE above we have $r(t)=e^{-\alpha t}r(0)+\frac{\theta}{\alpha}(1-e^{-\alpha t})+\sigma e^{-\alpha t}\int_{0}^{t}e^{\alpha u}dW(u) $ and when we take expectation and variance we have $r(t) \sim N(e^{-\alpha t}r(0)+\frac{\theta}{\alpha}(1-e^{-\alpha t}),\frac{\sigma^2}{2\alpha}(1-e^{-\alpha t}))$.

I know the calculate how find SDE and find expectation or variance but I don't understand why $r(t)$ has normal distribution.

thanks.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

For simplicity, we assume that $\alpha$ is a positive constant. You need to show that, for any $t>0$, \begin{align*} M_t = \int_0^t e^{\alpha u} dW_u \end{align*} is normally distributed, where $\{W_t, \, t \ge 0\}$ is a standard Brownian motion with respect to the filtration $\{\mathscr{F}_t,\, t \ge 0\}$. Here, we employ the time-changed Brownian motion technique. For $t\ge 0$, let $\mathscr{G}_t = \mathscr{F}_{\frac{1}{2}\ln(1+2t)}$. Consider the process $X=\{X_t, t \geq 0\}$, where \begin{align*} X_t = \int_0^{\frac{1}{2}\ln(1+2t)} e^{\alpha u} dW_u. \end{align*} Then $X$ is a continuous martingale with respect to the filtration $\{\mathscr{G}_t,\, t \ge 0\}$. Moreover, \begin{align*} \langle X, X\rangle_t &= \langle M, M\rangle_{\frac{1}{2}\ln(1+2t)}\\ &=\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}\ln(1+2t)} e^{2u} du =t. \end{align*} By Levy's martingale characterization of Brownian motion, $\{X_t, t \ge 0\}$ is a Brownian motion. That is, for $t >0$, $X_t$ is normally distributed. Consequently, for any $t >0$, \begin{align*} M_t &= \int_0^t e^{\alpha u} dW_u\\ &=X_{\frac{1}{2}(e^{2t}-1 )} \end{align*} is normally distributed, and $r_t$ is also normally distributed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ $X_t$ is the product of a function of $t$ and an Ito integral wich is a martingale. How you say that $X_t$ is a martingale too? $\endgroup$
    – ab94
    Sep 5, 2019 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @ab94. There are indeed some mistakes in the previous answer. See the revision above. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    Nov 26, 2019 at 19:20
5
$\begingroup$

This is a special case of the question of why $$ \int_0^T f(t) dW_t $$ is normally distributed for a continuous function $f(t).$ This Ito integral can be approximated by a sum $$ \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} f(i T/N) (W_{(i+1)T/N} - W_{i T/N}) .$$ The Brownian increments $(W_{(i+1)T/N} - W_{i T/N})$ are independent normally distributed random variables. The key point is that the sum of independent normally distributed variables is again normally distributed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The second key point is that if a sequence of normal variable converges in law then the limit is also normal. $\endgroup$
    – AFK
    May 18, 2015 at 21:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The sum, which is normal, converges to the ito integral in $L^2(P)$, and the key point is that the $L^2$ limit of a sequence of normal random variables is still normal. $\endgroup$
    – Gordon
    May 18, 2015 at 22:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.