I would like to have a bit more of intuition about the concept of "speed of mean reversion" for an interest rate model, e.g. Vasicek or CIR. In particular, is a negative speed of mean reversion possible? What's the connection between a mean reverting process and an AR(1) process? Does explosive AR(1) imply negative speed of mean reversion?
1 Answer
Mean reversion speed $\kappa$ is better interpreted with the concept of half-life, which can be calculated from $\text{HL} = \ln(2) / \kappa$. For example, if the mean reversion coefficient is $\kappa = 1.5$, then the half-life of the process is $\ln(2) / 1.5 = 0.46209812$ years, or about 6 months. Let's assume that the current interest rate is 1% and the equilibrium level is 5%. Then you'd expect interest rate to travel half the distance toward the equilibrium level (i.e., 2%) in about 6 months. Generally speaking, $\kappa$ should be positive, since interest rates do not tend to explode.
It is not uncommon to estimate mean reversion speed using an AR(1) process. In the context of interest rate modeling, this procedure gives you the mean reversion speed $\kappa$ in the physical measure ("real world"). For derivatives pricing, however, you need $\kappa$ in the risk-neutral measure, which can be obtained by fitting the model to market prices of some benchmark instruments.
-
1$\begingroup$ Some FOs I've spoken to say "mean reversion for hull white is 5%" - in the context of your example, this means rates take $\ln(2)/0.05 = 13.86$ years to travel from current level halfway to equilibrium. Is this the correct interpretation? $\endgroup$– crunchCommented Jul 2, 2015 at 15:16
-
1$\begingroup$ @crunch Strictly speaking, it's only correct in the absence of volatility, but this is the right conceptual framework to think about things. $\endgroup$– HelinCommented Jul 8, 2015 at 15:15
-
$\begingroup$ of course, lots of things are nice in the absence of volatility! $\endgroup$– crunchCommented Jul 9, 2015 at 6:39