I'm working in double exponential Jump-diffusion model (we know as kou model) with following form , under the physical probability measure $P$: \begin{equation} ‎\frac{dS(t)}{S(t-)}=\mu‎‏ ‎dt+\sigma ‎dW(‎t)+d(\sum_{i=1}^{N(t)}(V_i-1))‎ \end{equation}‎ where $W(t)$ is a standard Brownian motion, $N(t)$ is a Poisson process with rate $‎\lambda$ , and $\{V_i\}$ is a sequence of independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) non negative random variables such that $Y = log(V)$ has an asymmetric double exponential distribution with the density \begin{equation} f_Y(y)=p.‎\eta_1 e^{-‎\eta_{1}y‎‎}‎\upharpoonleft_{y‎\geq 0‎}+q.‎\eta_2 e^{‎\eta_2 y‎} \upharpoonleft_{y<0},\eta_{1}>1,\eta_{2}>0 ‎‎‎ ‎\end{equation}‎ where $p, q \ge 0$, $p+q = 1$, represent the probabilities of upward and downward jumps.

$$ $$ Solving the stochastic differential equation gives the dynamics of the asset price: \begin{equation} S(t)=S(0)‎\exp‎\{(\mu- ‎\frac{1}{2}‎\sigma‎^2‎)t+‎\sigma ‎W(t)‎\} ‎\prod‎_{i=1}^{N(t)}V_i ‎‎ \end{equation} and also The stock price process, $(S_t)_{t ‎\geq 0‎} $‎‎, driven by these model, is given by: \begin{equation} S_{t}=S_{0}e^{L_t} \end{equation} where $S_0$ is the stock price at time zero and $L_t$ is defined by: ‎\begin{equation} ‎L_t:=‎\gamma‎_{c}t+‎\sigma ‎W_t‎‎+\sum_{i=1}^{N_i}Y_i‎‎ \end{equation} here,$‎‎‎‎‎\gamma‎_{c}$‎ is a drift term , $‎‎‎‎‎\sigma‎$‎ is a volatility, $‎‎‎‏‎W_t‎$‎‎‎‎‎ is a Brownian motion, $‎‎‎‎N_t$‎ is a Possion process with intensity ‎$ ‎‎\lambda‎‎ $‎, $ ‎Y_i‎ $ is an i.i.d. sequence of random variables.Since $‎‎‎\sigma‎>0$ in up equation, there exists a risk-neutral probability measure $‎‎‎‎‎‏‎Q‎$‎‎‎‎ such that the discounted process ‎$‎‎‎‎\{e^{-(r-q)} S_t\}_{t ‎\geq 0‎}$‎ becomes a martingale,where ‎$ ‎r‎ $‎‎is the interest rate and $ ‎q‎ $ is the dividend rate.Then under this new measure $ ‎Q‎ $, the risk-neutral Levy triplet of $L_t$ can be described as follows: ‎\begin{equation*} (‎\gamma‎_{c},‎\sigma‎,‎‎\nu‎‎) \end{equation*} where ‎\begin{align*} ‎\gamma‎_{c} & = r-q-‎\frac{1}{2}‎\sigma‎^2+ ‎\int_{‎\mathbb{R}‎} ‎(e^x-1) ‎\nu(dx) ‎\\‎ & =‎ ‎‎r-q-‎\frac{1}{2}‎\sigma‎^2+ ‎\lambda ‎\eta‎ \end{align*}‎ Here we focus on the case where the Levy measure is associated to the pure-jump component and hence the Levy measure‎$ ‎\nu(dx)‎ $‎ can be written as ‎$ ‎‎\lambda‎‎‏ ‎f(x) ‎dx‎ $‎, where the weight function ‎$ ‎f(x)‎ $‎ can take the following form: \begin{equation} f(x):=p.‎\eta_1 e^{-‎\eta_{1}x‎‎}‎\upharpoonleft_{x‎\geq 0‎}+(1-p).‎\eta_2 e^{‎\eta_2 x‎} ‎‎‎\upharpoonleft_{x<0},\eta_1>1,\eta_2>0 \end{equation}

Also in ‎$ ‎\eta‎‏ = ‎\int_{‎\mathbb{R}‎}(e^x-1)f(x) ‎dx‎ $‎‎ represents the expected relative price change due to a jump. Since we have defined the Levy density function ‎$ ‎f(x)‎ $‎ for double exponential Jump-diffusion model, ‎$ ‎‎\eta‎‎ $‎‏‎ can be computed as: ‎\begin{equation} \eta=‏ ‎‎\frac{p‏ ‎‎\alpha‎‎_1}{‎‎\alpha‎_{1}-1}+‎\frac{(1-p)‎\alpha‎_2}{‎\alpha‎_2+1}-1‎‎ \end{equation}

This is found by integrating $ ‎e^x‎ $‎ over the real line by setting ‎$ ‎‎\alpha‎_1‎‏ ‎>1‎ $‎ and ‎$ ‎‎\alpha‎_{2}>0‎ $.

We let $\tau=T-t$, the time-to-maturity, where $T$ is the maturity of the financial option under consideration and we introduce $x = log S_t$, the underlying asset's log-price. If $u(x; \tau )$ denotes the values of some (American and European) contingent claim on $S_t$ when $log St = x$ and $\tau = T - t$, then it is well-known, see for example, (Cont and Tankov, 2004) that $u$ satisfies the following $PIDE$ in the non-exercise region: \begin{align*}‎‎‏‎ ‎\partial_‎\tau\, u(x,‎\tau‎)‏ &‎ = ‎‎\frac{1}{2}‎\sigma‎^2‏ ‎‎\partial‎_{x}^2‎ u‎ ‎+(r-q-‎\frac{1}{2}‎\sigma‎^2‎-\lambda \eta)‎\partial‎_x ‎u-(r+‎\lambda‎)u \\ ‎&+ ‎‎\lambda ‎\int ‎_{‎\mathbb{R}‎} ‎u(x+y,‎\tau‎) ‎f(y) ‎dy‎ ‎‎\end{align*}‎‎‎ with initial value ‎\begin{equation} ‎ u(x,0)=g(x):‎=G(e^x)= \begin{cases} max\{e^x-k,0\}, & \text{call option} \\ max\{k-e^x,0\}, & \text{put option} \end{cases} ‎\end{equation}

my question is how we can derive the above $PIDE$ I've searched a lot of article but most of them only mention the $PIDE$ and we said you can find in Cont and Tankov Book and also I've searched in this book but I could not find the Exactly above $PIDE$.

thanks for help.

  • $\begingroup$ Should $‎\partial_‎\tau(x,‎\tau‎)$ be $‎\partial_‎\tau \, u(x,‎\tau‎)$? $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jul 10 '15 at 20:36

Let $\{P_t \mid t \geq 0\}$ be a compound Poisson process, where \begin{align*} P_t = \sum_{i=1}^{N_t} (V_i -1), \end{align*} and $N_t$ is a Poisson process with intensity $\lambda$ and jump times $\tau_i$, $i = 1, \ldots, \infty$. Let $Y_i=\ln V_i$ and $f(x)$ be the density function. Then \begin{align*} P_t - \lambda t E(V_1) &= P_t - \lambda t \int_{\mathbb{R}}(e^x-1)f(x) dx \end{align*} is a martingale. We denote by $\eta = \int_{\mathbb{R}}(e^x-1)f(x) dx$. Moreover, we assume that the equity price process $\{S_t \mid t \geq 0\}$ satisfies the SDE \begin{align*} \frac{dS_t}{S_t} = (r-q-\lambda \eta)dt + \sigma dW_t + dP_t, \end{align*} where $\{W_t \mid t \geq 0\}$ is a standard Brownian motion. Then \begin{align*} S_t = S_0 \exp\Big(\big(r-q-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 - \lambda \eta \big)t + \sigma W_t + \sum_{i=1}^{N_t} Y_i \Big). \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} d \ln S_t = (r-q-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2-\lambda \eta)dt + \sigma dW_t + d\sum_{i=1}^{N_t} Y_i. \end{align*}

Let $X_t = \ln S_t$, and $u(X_t, t)$ be the option price at time $t$, where $0 \leq t \leq T$. Then, by Ito's formula, \begin{align*} u(X_t, t) &= u(X_0, 0) + \int_0^t\partial_t u(X_s, s) ds + \int_0^t\partial_x u(X_{s-}, s) dX_s + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \int_0^t \partial_{xx} u(X_s, s)ds\\ & \qquad +\sum_{s \leq t}\big[u(X_s, s) - u(X_{s-}, s) - \partial_x u(X_{s-}, s)\Delta X_s\big] \quad (\mbox{where } \Delta X_s=X_s - X_{s-})\\ &= u(X_0, 0) + \int_0^t\partial_t u(X_s, s) ds + \int_0^t\partial_x u(X_{s}, s) dX_s^c + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \int_0^t \partial_{xx} u(X_s, s)ds\\ & \qquad +\sum_{s \leq t}\big[u(X_t, t) - u(X_{t-}, t) \big] \quad (\mbox{where } X_t^c = \big(r-q-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 - \lambda \eta \big)t + \sigma W_t)\\ &= u(X_0, 0) + \int_0^t\partial_t u(X_s, s) ds + \int_0^t\partial_x u(X_{s}, s) dX_s^c + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \int_0^t \partial_{xx} u(X_s, s)ds\\ & \qquad +\int_0^t \int_{\mathbb{R}}\big[ u(X_{s-} + y, s) - u(X_{s-}, s))\big]\mu(ds, dy) \quad (\mbox{where } \mu = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \delta_{\tau_i, Y_i})\\ &= u(X_0, 0) + \int_0^t\partial_t u(X_s, s) ds + \int_0^t\partial_x u(X_{s}, s) dX_s^c + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \int_0^t \partial_{xx} u(X_s, s)ds\\ &\qquad +\int_0^t \int_{\mathbb{R}}\big[ u(X_{s-} + y, s) - u(X_{s-}, s))\big](\mu(ds, dy) - ds v(dy)) \\ &\qquad +\int_0^t ds\int_{\mathbb{R}}\big[ u(X_{s} + y, s) - u(X_{s}, s))\big]\lambda f(y)dy, \end{align*} where $v(dy) = \lambda f(y)dy$. Here \begin{align*} M_t = \int_0^t \int_{\mathbb{R}}\big[ u(X_{s-} + y, s) - u(X_{s-}, s))\big](\mu(ds, dy) - ds v(dy)) \end{align*} is a martingale. Since $u(X_t, t) e^{-rt}$ is a martingale, and \begin{align*} d\big(u(X_t, t) e^{-rt}\big) &= e^{-rt}\big[-r u dt + du\big], \end{align*} we obtain that \begin{align*} &-ru(X_t, t) + \partial_t u(X_t, t) + \big(r-q-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 - \lambda \eta \big)\partial_x u(X_{s}, s) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \partial_{xx} u(X_t, t) \\ & \qquad\qquad + \int_{\mathbb{R}}\big[ u(X_{t} + y, t) - u(X_{t}, t))\big]\lambda f(y)dy = 0. \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} & \partial_t u(X_t, t) + \big(r-q-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 - \lambda \eta \big)\partial_x u(X_{s}, s) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 \partial_{xx} u(X_t, t) -(r+\lambda)u(X_t, t)\\ & \qquad\qquad + \lambda \int_{\mathbb{R}} u(X_{t} + y, t) f(y)dy = 0. \end{align*}


Let's start with the main idea, I hope you can finish the computations yourself. Whenever you want to derive a pricing equation, try the following approach: discounted value of portfolio/option/derivative must be a martingale for non-arbitrage reasons. Since you have a Markovian dynamics in variables $t$ and $S$, you assume that the price is some function $V(t,S)$. What you need to do know is to compute the Ito differential $$ \mathrm d\left(\mathrm e^{-rt}V(t,S_t)\right) = (\dots)\mathrm dt + (\dots)\mathrm dw_t + (\dots)\mathrm d\bar N_t $$ where $\bar N_t$ is the compensated Poisson process. The last two terms are martingales, so the term in the first bracket must be zero: that gives you the pricing equation. For the computation of this differential, and $\bar N_t$ see e.g. Shreve's II volume.

  • $\begingroup$ The original poster may just want to know how to derive the first term. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jul 9 '15 at 13:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.