I'm studying the "single factor model" in Malz text "Financial Risk Management - Models, History and Institutions". He only refers to it as such and gives it no proper name.
The model:
$a_{i} = \beta_{i}m+(\sqrt{1-\beta^2})\epsilon_{i}$
$\beta$ is the correlation of the firm to the state of the economy
$m$ is the state of the economy
I'm a bit confused here. The author first says we can use the model to convert an unconditional probability of default into one conditional on the state of the economy
and then further says "The unconditional probability of a particular loss level (the fraction of the portfolio that defaults) is equal to the probability that the market factor return that leads to that loss level is realized"
We find both probabilities in the same way:
$p(m) = \phi( \frac{k_{i}-\beta_{i}m}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} )$
Where $k = \phi^{-1}(\pi)$
and $\pi$ = unconditional probability of default in the first usage and probability of realizing the market factor leading to observed the loss level in the second usage.
These sound opposite to me. In one usage we are finding a conditional PD and in another what is described as an unconditional.