How do cost of revenue and SG&A compare (across industries)?

For cost of revenue, one definition is "the cost of manufacturing and delivering a product or service".

Assuming my product is beer, my cost of revenue would be cost of water, barley, wheat etc, correct?

But that's very incomplete. I mean, to generate revenue from water and barley I needed: - all the brewery equipment - possibly financing the above - sell the product to the customer

But from what I understand, the cost of sales (and marketing etc) of my product is only included in operating expenses (under SG&A) and my financial expenses in continous operations.

So if anything, the name "cost of revenue" seems to be misleading.

Then as we start comparing companies and industries, it seems not everybody is using the same standards. For example, Oracle has only 20% of their cost presented as "cost of revenue" while IBM has about 50%. Without really understanding what's in there, the numbers seems incomparable. Then what if we'd compare say automotive to IT... does it have any sense at all?


closed as off-topic by lehalle, olaker Oct 13 '15 at 15:03

  • This question does not appear to be about quantitative finance within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not quant finance $\endgroup$ – lehalle Oct 12 '15 at 21:57
  1. Cost of Sales vs. SG&A. Cost of sales are your expenses directly incurred in the production cycle or service delivery. SG&A is overhead incurred while helping production. The main difference between the two (roughly) is that Costs differ with production level (almost) while SG&A is considered to be fixed. One more subtle accounting difference, Cost of Sales is accounted for on accrual basis (matched to sales) while SG&A is charged to Income statement in the period it's incurred.
  2. You may use Cost of Sales vs SG&A within one company for break-even analysis, to calculate how much production you need to sell to cover overhead (or vice versa how many admin people to lay off to match current state of the economy). Or you may use historical records of both to identify why your net income margins have shrunk during the last quarter (this would be called horizontal analysis).
  3. Comparing Cost of Sales and SG&A between two companies, even within the same industry may be tricky, as you said. The job of the Financial analyst in this case is to make two sets of the Financial Statements as comparable as possible before drawing any conclusion that one company is more management-wise efficient than the other. Adjustment may include bringing both companies to the same:
    • accounting basis (GAAP or IFRS)
    • inventory accounting rules (FIFO or LIFO)
    • depreciation rules

Let alone that similar items in two similar companies may be under different names.

Why knowing these two important:

when you assess prospects of buying a company you need to understand if the company generates enough cash (think of EBITDA here and EV/EBITDA which is a shortcut for company value), generates it effectively, and if the operations could be improved. Knowing Costs of sales and SG&A (as pct of revenue) helps compare companies at operational level within industry and across industries.

Disclaimer: the definitions for Costs of Sales and SG&A are not intended as accounting guidance. E.g., there are situations when production stops, but the company reports some minimum cost of revenue to support production site. Rather, these are intended as general logic behind strict accounting definitions that may help to memorize the difference between the two.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.