4
$\begingroup$

I've been learning about Feynman-Kac recently and I understand the underlying ideas. I am stuck however in actually computing explicit solutions for specific problems.

For example, suppose I have the following terminal value problem:

$$F_t + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2x^2F_{xx}=1$$

$$F(x,T) = \ln(x)^4,~x>0$$

How would I compute $F(x,t)$ in closed form, given the closed form of the right hand side $(ln(x))^4$ using Feynman-Kac?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well, what have you tried so far? Maybe state the Faynman-Kac formula and see how it relates to your example first. $\endgroup$ – SRKX Dec 3 '15 at 7:01
2
$\begingroup$

Based on the form of your equation, we can consider the SDE \begin{align*} dX_t = \sigma X_t dW_t, \end{align*} where $W$ is a standard Brownian motion under the measure $Q$. Since, for $0 \leq t \leq T$, \begin{align*} X_T = X_t \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 (T-t) + \sigma \int_t^T dW_s \right), \end{align*} based on Feynman–Kac formula, the solution is given by \begin{align*} F(t, x) &= E^Q\left(\int_t^T ds + (\ln X_T)^4 \mid X_t = x\right)\\ &=(T-t) + E^Q\left[\left(\ln x -\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 (T-t) + \sigma \int_t^T dW_s\right)^4\right]. \end{align*} The remaining is now simple and is omitted.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The computation of the expectation is simple, but may be tedious. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Dec 3 '15 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ @SriramNagaraj if you're happy with the answer, then please mark it as accepted. $\endgroup$ – SRKX Dec 4 '15 at 6:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.