I have seen this interview question mentioned in a couple of places:

There are three call options on the market, with the same expiry and with strikes 10, 20, and 30. Suppose the call option with strike 10 costs \$12, the call option with strike 20 costs \$7, and the call option with strike 30 costs \$1. Is there an arbitrage opportunity?

The answer apparently is to buy two of the call options priced at \$20, and sell one of each of the call options priced at \$10 and \$30.

How does one arrive at this answer and is it unique?



1 Answer 1


A similar question for put option has been discussed in this question: Finding Arbitrage in two Puts. Basically, the call option payoff is a convex function of the strike. Then the call option price is also a convex function of the strike. Specifically, let $C(K)$ denote the call option price with strike $K$. Then for $ 0 < K_1 < K_2$, \begin{align*} C\left(\frac{K_1 + K_2}{2}\right) \le \frac{1}{2}\big(C(K_1) + C(K_2) \big). \end{align*}

For the example, let $K_1 = 10$ and $K_2 = 30$. Then \begin{align*} C(20) &= C\left(\frac{K_1 + K_2}{2}\right)\\ &\le \frac{1}{2}\big(C(K_1) + C(K_2) \big)\\ &= \frac{1}{2} (12 + 1) = 6.5. \end{align*} However, $C(20) = 7$, which contradicts to the above. Therefore, there is an arbitrage opportunity.

For an arbitrage strategy, we should short (i.e., sell) the option that is over-priced, and long (i.e., buy) the option that is under-priced. Specifically, we short two options with strike 20, and long one option with strike 10 and long another option with strike 30. At the start, we have the profit \begin{align*} 2 \times 7 - 12 - 1 = 1 $. \end{align*} At the option maturity, the payoff to us is \begin{align*} (S_T-10)^+ + (S_T-30)^+ - 2 (S_T-20)^+ = \begin{cases} 0, & \mbox{if } S_T \leq 10,\\ S_T-10, & \mbox{if } 10 \le S_T \le 20, \\ 30-S_T, & \mbox{if } 20\le S_T \le 30,\\ 0 , & \mbox{if } S_T \ge 30, \end{cases} \end{align*} which is always non-negative. Then, we have a guaranteed profit at the start and potential further profit at the option maturity, while without any liabilities.

  • $\begingroup$ Question about the payoff at maturity. Why is the payoff 0 when S_T is greater than 30? I thought that since we have the option to buy at 30, we would make money if the stock price is greater than 30. $\endgroup$
    – Wokwok
    Commented Dec 14, 2015 at 23:17
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If $S_T$ above 30 You make on the K=30 and the K=10, but you lose on the two K=20 that you are short. So you gain nothing. $\endgroup$
    – Alex C
    Commented Dec 14, 2015 at 23:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.