1
$\begingroup$

I saw this question as an interview, and to be honest, I have no idea what it's even asking for:

Write a function (in R or Python) that finds the stock drawdown which will trigger a rebalance, if given:

  1. an X% stock (vs bond) target allocation; and

  2. a Y% drift threshold from target allocation.

Do I pick a drawdown figure (20%?) and then calculate how much stocks need to fall to hit 20% portfolio DD given x% in stocks?

Do bond returns stay constant?

Same thing with the 2nd question, I just don't seem to understand what they are asking?

Any help appreciated!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Say X0 is the % of stock at the peek

For 1), assuming the bond return stays constant, we will trigger a rebalance when:

$\frac{X_0(1 - DD)}{X_0(1-DD) + (1 - X_0)} = \frac{X_0(1-DD)}{1-X0.DD} = X$, and solving for DD gives $ DD = \frac{X_0 - X}{X_0(1 - X)} $

For 2), I would say same answer replacing $X$ by $ X(1 - Y) $

Not sure if this the correct answer, question formulation is weird.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure here, assume bond return is $r_B$, stock return is $r_S$ and define bond weight $B_0 = 1 - X_0$, then you get $X_1 = X_0 (1+r_S)$ and $B_1 = B_0 ( 1+r_B) = (1-X_0)(1+r_B)$ but if you want to see them as weight, you need to "re-normalize" them like $X_1' = \frac{X_1}{X_1+X_2}$ and same for $B_1'$... $\endgroup$ – SRKX Jan 1 '16 at 9:18
  • $\begingroup$ @SRXK do you mean $ X_1' = \frac{X_1}{X_1+B_1} $ ? $\endgroup$ – Alex C Jan 1 '16 at 11:32
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm SRKX has a valid point, my answer didn't "assume the bond return stays constant", it assumed bond return was 0% over the period !! $\endgroup$ – Karim L Jan 1 '16 at 18:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.